InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

MIP European Patent Reform Forum 2017 - Munich agenda

September 5, The Charles Hotel, Munich
September 7, Paris Marriott Champs Elysees, Paris


 
Agenda-Munich 
Agenda- Paris 
Speakers - Munich 
Speakers - Paris 
delegates Munich 
Delegates - Paris 
 
Contact us

Download the brochure


08:15 Registration

08:50 Opening remarks by Kingsley Egbuonu, IP stars & MIP reporter, Managing IP

09:00 Keynote address: Raimund Lutz, vice president of the department for legal & international affairs, European Patent Office

09:15 Final preparations for the sunrise period: to opt or not to opt?

  • How to undertake a successful opt-out and adjustments to your filing strategy
  • Practical steps and strategies for the next 3-6 months
  • Will the UK stay or go post-Brexit?

Ulrich Blumenröder , partner, Grünecker
Sebastian Ochs,
partner, Grünecker

10:05 Procedures to obtaining evidence of an infringement

  • The rules of evidence in the UPC
  • Drawing comparisons between different systems in Europe
  • Analysing the procedural advantages of each jurisdiction

Axel Casalonga, senior partner and European patent attorney, Casalonga
Floriane Codevelle, partner, Casalonga


10:55 Coffee break and networking


11:20 Litigating and licensing SEPs in Europe

  • Questions unanswered by Unwired Planet
  • German decisions after Huawei v ZTE
  • A comparison of the German and UK approach to the Huawei v ZTE framework
  • Availability of final injunctions in Germany and the UK for SEP infringements
  • SEP litigation in the UPC – who will benefit and who will lose out?

David Barron , partner, Gowling WLG ( moderator )
Huw Edwards , senior IPR litigation counsel, Nokia
Matthias Schneider , senior licensing manager, Audi
David Molnia , partner, df-mp


12:10 UK Courts get down to business: application of discretion and flexibility to resolve commercial uncertainty

  • Arrow declarations to weed out thickets of divisionals
  • Developments in worldwide discretionary telecoms declarations
  • Impact of Supreme Court in Pemetrexed on declarations of non-infringement

Alex Wilson, partner, Powell Gilbert
Pete Damerell , partner, Powell Gilbert


13:00 Lunch and networking


13:50 Life sciences and pharma litigation

  • Life sciences and the unitary patent package: will the system be used and if so how?
  • Taking advantage of second medical use patents and data: enough is enough
  • Patent protection strategies involving divisionals: have we gone too far?

Robert Burrows , partner, Bristows 
Savroop Purewal,
director patent law, Janssen Sciences
Simon Spink,
senior associate, Bristows

14:40 How can defendants use the UPC to revoke patents?

  • What litigation will exist in national courts and EPO in parallel to the UPC?
  • Pros and cons
  • Patent litigation and forum shopping at a cross-EU level
  • Will the UPC system be able to apply the bifurcation principle?

Marianne Schaffner, partner, Dechert


15:30 Coffee break and networking


15:50 Case study: efficiently protecting your software-related inventions: the do’s and don’ts

  • Which software inventions can be protected by European patents?
  • What are the important issues when drafting a European patent application for a software-related invention?
  • What are the crucial questions the EPO examiner will ask you?
  • What remedies are available to you if your software-related patent application is refused at first instance

Koen Lievens, director operations, information & communications technology, European Patent Office

16:30 Effective dispute resolution mechanisms

  • Understanding the alternatives to court proceedings in the UPC
  • Patent Mediation and Arbitration Centre (PMAC) case study
  • Enforcement of arbitration judgements

Clemens Heusch , head of European IP litigation, Nokia  
Bastian Arnold, senior legal counsel, Osram


17:10 Close of conference

 


Sponsors

Bristows
Casalonga
Dechert

Gowling WLG
Powell Gilbert
Powell Gilbert

Ropes & Gray






Association partner

AIPPI GRUR


profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

Federal Circuit’s Brunetti ruling: barring immoral or scandalous marks is unconstitutional restriction of free spee… https://t.co/MivCKFINHg

Dec 15 2017 10:12 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Federal Circuit rules in Amgen v Sandoz on remand from SCOTUS https://t.co/uYIkfVhCHG https://t.co/2OZAscsz32

Dec 14 2017 09:58 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

RT @mdloney: Canada moves closer to joining the Hague Agreement with the release of proposed new Industrial Design Regulations https://t.co

Dec 12 2017 10:22 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
More from the Managing IP blog


null null null

null null null

End of Year 2017

Tribal sovereign immunity: Taking a wrecking ball to the IPR system

The lawyer behind Allergan’s controversial transfer of patents to a Native American tribe says others are “lining up to do deals”. But, Michael Loney asks, will the PTAB rule that sovereign immunity applies in these types of deals?



Most read articles

Supplements