InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

MIP US Patent Forum 2017 - Palo Alto Agenda 

March 21, Four Seasons Hotel, Palo Alto
March 23, Four Seasons Hotel, Washington DC




Agenda Palo Alto

Agenda DC

Speakers

Speakers DC

Delegates







Contact us

Download the 2017 brochure


8.30 Registration

9.00 Opening remarks by Michael Loney, Americas editor, Managing IP

9.10 Patent Trial and Appeal Board: top issues after four years

  • Overview of settlements from the past year to establish ongoing trends
  • Case study: scope of discretion in institution and estoppel – Shaw Industries v
    Automated Creel Systems
  • What is reviewable in institution decisions and how can you challenge the decision?
  • Examining the inconsistences between the district court and federal circuit in
    addressing evidence

Joseph Haag, partner, WilmerHale (moderator)
Judge Kevin Turner, administrative patent judge, USPTO
Kaare Larson
, senior director of intellectual property, Dexcom
Mark Selwyn
, partner, WilmerHale


10.00 Adapting to PTAB Rule Changes & Complying with the Administrative Procedures Act (APA)

  • Analysing the impact of the rule changes – what’s different?
  • How the introduction of testimonial evidence has impacted proceedings
  • Discretion and reviewability at the PTO

Scott McKeown, partner, Oblon (moderator)
Shawn Ambwani, COO and co-founder, Unified Patents
Judge Tina Hulse, administrative patent judge, USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board


10.50 Coffee break and networking


11.20 PTAB & the Federal Circuit

  • Back log: can the appeals court cope with the case load - are rule 36 affirmances on the increase?
  • Role of federal circuit in PTAB appeals
  • Recent decisions – are we leaning towards new examination guidelines?

Darren Donnelly, partner, Fenwick & West (moderator)
Deanna Kwong
, IP litigation counsel, Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Sriranga Veeraraghavan
, vice president, legal, Tessera
Charlene Morrow, partner, Fenwick & West


12.10 PTAB & the District Court

  • Interface between district court litigation and inter parte reviews in post-grant
    proceedings
  • Tracking the ‘stay motion’ success rate – why is there discrepancies between districts?
  • Timing is everything: identification of real party in interest
  • Effective obviousness rationales at the district court and PTAB

Gary Ropski, partner, Brinks Gilson & Lione (moderator)
Kim Schmitt
, managing counsel, litigation group, Intel
Qudus Olaniran
, patent attorney, Microsoft
Miyoung Shin
, partner, Brinks Gilson & Lione


13.00 Lunch and networking


14.00  Precedential and informative decisions designated by PTAB

  • Tips to incorporate the precedential and informative decisions into your strategy
  • What have we learned from Cuozzo v Lee?
  • Top cases to watch over the next 12 months

Lissi Mojica, principal, Brooks Kushman (moderator)
Steve Chiang, senior director and IP Counsel, RPX Corporation
Deanna Kwong
, IP litigation counsel, Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Sangeeta Shah
, shareholder, Brooks Kushman


14.50 PTAB practice updates for high tech companies

  • Eligibility for covered business method patents: a moving target
  • Considerations for determining whether to pursue a CBM/PGR or an IPR
  • Secondary considerations: a new dogfight?

Aaron Capron, partner, Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner (moderator)
Cory Bell, attorney, Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner


15.40 Coffee break and networking

16.00 PTAB trials: strategies for litigating at the PTAB

  • Risks and remedies of litigating at the PTAB
  • How to impress PTAB judges to get the best out of AIA trial hearings
  • Constructing a successful trial: practice recommendations for counsel
  • Understanding the intersection with district court litigation

Brian McCormack, partner, Baker & McKenzie (moderator)
Richard Sonnentag, litigation counsel, Google
Neil Mothew, vice president, intellectual property & legal affairs, Real D
Daniel Tallitsch
, partner, Baker & McKenzie


16.50 PTAB by the numbers: key influences on filings

  • Slump versus stabilisation: have filings decreased over the past year?
  • Analysing the growing demand for post-grant review
  • Drawing comparisons between invalidation claims versus institutions rates

Jason Eisenberg, partner, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox (moderator)
Rob Saltzberg
, founder, Almanac IP Advisors
John Blake
, vice president, IP strategy, Tivo
Mike Messinger
, director, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox


17.40 Close of conference




Sponsors

Baker McKenzie
BGL_logo
Brooks Kushman

bskb_logo
Fenwick_West_logo
Finnegan

f
McDermott Will & Emery
Oblon

Oblon
RF
Sterne Kessler

WilmerHale_logo





































Exhibitor


 LexisNexis   Innography
   

Association partner


AIPLA_logo
   

 



 

Supporting Organization

IPO 
SVIPLA
 

 
 
 









 


 

profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

@schestowitz Well, we do what we think is most appropriate & useful for our readers. Can't speak for others.

Apr 28 2017 04:43 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

@schestowitz It's true that we have sought interviews with AMBA (not specifically on UPC) and permission was refused by the EPO president.

Apr 28 2017 04:41 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

@schestowitz However, we have also given space to voices critical of UPC & Unitary Patent, eg in Spain & Poland https://t.co/QXiPQknzDg

Apr 28 2017 04:38 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
More from the Managing IP blog


April 2017

Patent subject matter eligibility: A new Section 101

Calls for changing Section 101 of the Patent Act in the US are increasing. A proposed amendment from IPO shows one way to do it, reports Michael Loney



Most read articles

Supplements