InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

European Patent Reform Forum USA 2014

FREE registration for in-house/patent / IP counsel, academics and R&D professionals

SV Registration


December 10 2014, San Jose


NY Registration

December 12 2014, New York




Agenda - Silicon Valley

Agenda - New York

Agenda - New York

Agenda - New York



Contact us


Download the agenda for San Jose here.
Download the agenda for New York City here.

8.00 Registration


8.45 Opening remarks by Edward Kelly and Charles Larsen, partners, Ropes & Gray

8.50 The European Patent Reform: an overview
, by Pierre Véron, partner, Véron & Associés; Member of the Expert Panel group of the Unified Patent Court; Member of the Drafting Committee of the Rules of Procedure

9.05 The Unitary Patent

  • What does the new patent look like? How does it work?
  • Pros and cons of filing the UP in comparison to a national patent
  • Strategic advice for prosecution
  • A guide to the translation regime
  • An overview of costs and implications for your budget

Stefan Luginbuehl, lawyer, international legal affairs, European Patent Office
Dmitry Tulchinsky
, Intellectual Property Liaison, DuPont Industrial Biosciences
Alexandra Brodie
, partner, Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Michael Schneider
, partner, Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co

10.00 Understanding the Unified Patent Court in detail

  • How to best understand and utilise the new divisions and structures
  • Strategising in advance to gain a competitive edge over your competitors

James Boon, partner, Bristows
Richard Pinckney
, associate, Bristows
Leah Poynter
, director, IP litigation, Cisco

10.45 Coffee break and networking

11.00 Bifurcation: Why you shouldn't be scared of it

  • What is it, and how does it work?
  • Evaluating pros and cons of bifurcation
  • What can you learn from current German practices?
  • Implications of bifurcation for US companies, and how to handle them

Katy Motiey, Chief Legal Officer, Spansion
Larry Horn
, CEO, MPEG LA
Pamela Simonton
, executive vice president and general counsel, Exelixis Pharmaceuticals
Gottfried Schüll
, partner, COHAUSZ & FLORACK
Arwed Burrichter
, partner, COHAUSZ & FLORACK

11.55 Industry discussion: Global litigation strategies

  • How to utilise simultaneous proceedings in a number of countries to get ahead of your competitor
  • Which countries are best suited to invalidate your competitor's patents
  • Best global litigation practices on limited budgets

Kevin Jakel, CEO and founder, Unified Patents
Subroto Bose
, IP counsel, Altera Corporation
Isaac Peterson
, director, litigation & IP, Netflix
William Cook
, partner, Marks & Clerk
Graham Burnett-Hall
, partner, Marks & Clerk

12.50 Lunch and networking

13.40 How to win opposition proceedings without discovery

  • The benefits and pitfalls of discovery
  • Similarities with and lessons learned from PTAB proceedings
  • Best practises to survive without obtaining evidence from the opposing party

Koen Bijvank, partner, V.O.
Daniel Young
, partner, Swanson & Bratschun
Bernard Ledeboer
, partner, V.O.
Emma Barraclough
, group editor, Managing IP (moderator)

14.35 Litigation planning and forum shopping in the European Unified Patent Court

  • Game over? Litigation planning and strategy under the new UPC
  • Risks and opportunities of forum shopping in Europe

Catherine Lacavera, director of litigation, Google
Tim Powell
, partner, Powell Gilbert
Zoe Butler
, partner, Powell Gilbert
Isabelle Romet, partner, Véron & Associés

15.30 Coffee break and networking
15.45 Working with your European Patent Attorney

  • Forward planning
  • Alternative filing strategies
  • Prosecution decisions and approach

 Rosie Hardy, UK and European Patent Attorney, Withers & Rogers LLP

16.15 Alternative IP strategies parallel to the UPC

  • Avoiding costly litigation: dispute resolution alternatives in Europe
  • Best practices and strategies to utilise: third party observation; opposition; and central revocation
  • Interdependency and interplay between existing legal mechanisms and the UPC

David Por, partner, Allen & Overy
Joachim Feldges
, partner, Allen & Overy

17.10 Closing remarks by Edward Kelly and Charles Larsen, partners, Ropes & Gray

17.20 End of conference


Supporting Organisations



            




Sponsors

        

Bristows      Cohausz & Florack
         
           V.O. Patent & Trademarks

      


Media Partner

profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

RT @IPaware: Download white paper from @ManagingIP - surviving #Brexit for UK #IP firms https://t.co/dxxJNhgQbk https://t.co/CvKrHX9JbJ

Oct 18 2017 07:23 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Well done to all involved! #AIPPI2017 #CII https://t.co/q5PbWThHjf

Oct 17 2017 12:59 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Friends in high places? #AIPPI2017 https://t.co/YnqhCgqIrh

Oct 17 2017 12:58 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
More from the Managing IP blog


null null null

October 2017

Courts grapple with scope of patent protection

The Supreme Court’s decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly introduced a doctrine of equivalents and arguably also established a doctrine of prosecution history estoppel in the UK. We look at the law across Europe, and the impact the decision might have. Kingsley Egbuonu, Michael Loney and James Nurton set the scene



Most read articles

Supplements