InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

European Patent Reform Forum 2014: AGENDA - MUNICH




Agenda-Munich

Agenda- Paris

Speakers - Munich

Speakers - Paris

delegates Munich

Delegates - Paris



Contact us

Download the Munich agenda

8.00 Registration

8.45 Opening remarks by Managing IP

8.50 The Unified Patent Court explained in detail

  • How to best navigate the new divisions and structures
  • A practical guide to making best use of the courts and mitigating costs
  • Understanding procedures: From starting proceedings through to trial
  • Strategising in advance
Tim Powell, partner, Powell Gilbert
Christine Kanz, partner, ROKH IP
Pierre Véron
, partner, Véron & Associés

9.45 Split Proceedings and the UPC

  • Complaints by Licensees, Counterclaims for Revocation against Proprietor
  • Bifurcation: Debunking the myths - Evaluating the possible pros and cons
  • Appeals against Bifurcation under the 16th draft of the Rules of Procedure
  • What should be learnt from current German practice?
  • How judges will handle bifurcation
Jochen Meyer, head of IPR Germany, Vodafone
Joachim Feldges,
partner, Allen & Overy
David Por,
partner, Allen & Overy

10.40 Coffee break and networking

    11.00 The European Court of Justice and the Unified Patent Court

    • How the Spanish challenge affected plans for the new system
    • When will/ won't the ECJ be able to review issues of law pertaining to patents?
    David Rose, partner, King & Wood Mallesons SJ Berwin
    Axel Walz,
    partner, King & Wood Mallesons SJ Berwin

    11.55 Swiss focus

    • The new patent court – how does it work?
    • Implications of the new patent court, and how it interacts with the UPC
    • Challenges and opportunities for companies doing business in Switzerland
    Simon Holzer, partner, meyerlustenberger | lachenal
    Michael Ritscher,
    partner, meyerlustenberger | lachenal

    12.25 Lunch and networking

      13.15 The Unitary Patent

      • Pros and cons of filing the UP in comparison to a national patent
      • Strategic advice for prosecution
      • A guide to the translation regime
      • An overview of costs
      Eskil Waage, lawyer, international legal affairs, European Patent Office
      Michael Schneider,
      partner, Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
      David Barron,
      partner, Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co

      14.10 Alternative IP strategies parallel to the UPC

      • Avoiding the down-sides of court litigation before the UPC: Alternative dispute resolution and arbitration proceedings
      • Best practices and strategies to utilize third party observations and opposition proceedings before the EPO
      • Interdependency and future interplay between existing legal mechanisms and the UPC-system
      Simon Roberts, director of patents, BT
      Jürgen Schneider,
      vice president, global IP & IP litigation, QIAGEN
      Clemens Plassmann,
      partner, Hogan Lovells
      Steffen Steininger,
      partner, Hogan Lovells

      15.05 Coffee break and networking

        15.25 Litigation planning and forum shopping in the European Unified Patent Court

        • Game over? Litigation planning and strategy under the new UPC
        • Risks and opportunities of forum shopping in Europe
        Penny Gilbert, partner, Powell Gilbert
        Kay Kasper,
        partner, ROKH IP
        Thomas Bouvet
        , partner, Véron & Associés

        16.20 Inter-industry debate - International litigation considerations

        • How different countries regard the UPC
        • The future of national legislation
        • The unanswered questions about the UPC
        Michael Fröhlich, senior director, EU intellectual property & strategy, Blackberry
        Clemens Heusch,
        head of European litigation, Nokia
        Alex Wilson,
        partner, Powell Gilbert
        Tobias Hahn,
        partner, ROKH IP
        Sabine Age
        , partner, Véron & Associés

        17.15 End of conference

           


        Lead Sponsors

             ROKH IP      Vernon & Associes

        Sponsors

             Grunecker

        Hogan Lovells      King & Wood Mallesons SJ Berwin      Meyerlustenberger Lachenal


        Ropes & Gray     


        Association Partner

        EPO      GRUR      GRUR

        Media Partner

        Patent Lawyer
        profile

        Managing IP

        ManagingIP

        ManagingIP profile

        "The recent proposal of automatically granting pending applications without examination is nothing but a desperate… https://t.co/9lE4RD00Rz

        Nov 20 2017 09:17 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
        ManagingIP profile

        New speakers announced at our NY https://t.co/sCxge69xRz and CA https://t.co/BGVnkVWSpC European Patent Events. F… https://t.co/3MlekFfPZR

        Nov 20 2017 03:33 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
        ManagingIP profile

        India’s Supreme Court pushes for faster IPR suits https://t.co/G0vmxWOc5g Delhi High Court has been given until mid… https://t.co/W576LiUGCF

        Nov 20 2017 10:05 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
        More from the Managing IP blog


        null null null

        null null null

        October 2017

        Courts grapple with scope of patent protection

        The Supreme Court’s decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly introduced a doctrine of equivalents and arguably also established a doctrine of prosecution history estoppel in the UK. We look at the law across Europe, and the impact the decision might have. Kingsley Egbuonu, Michael Loney and James Nurton set the scene



        Most read articles

        Supplements