InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

US PATENT FORUM - OVERVIEW

March 25, 2014 - Willard InterContinental, Washington D.C.

null


null

null

null

null

null

null

null

Facing major legal developments, especially in the US and Europe, IP owners have to constantly work at the forefront of IP law to maintain competitiveness and protect their most valuable assets. New amendments to the America Invents Act (AIA), first outcomes of post-grant proceedings, an increasingly activist Supreme Court and major changes to the international tax system affecting your intangible assets pose incredibly dynamic and challenging problems.

With focus on litigation, licensing, patent protection and IP commercialisation in the US as well as the most important global developments, the MIP US Patent Forum 2014 is a learning opportunity for leaders managing IP portfolios in the US and abroad.

This forum took a close look at the most recent challenges to IP, which included: a guide to improve your company’s patent application process post-AIA; an evaluation of post-grant proceedings; new updates on the European unified patent court; and analysis of recent standard essential patent (SEP) litigation between Apple and Samsung.

Key take aways

Key note - Michelle Lee

  • USPTO to improve patent system with help from industry and IP experts – it is a combined task
  • Three executive orders are in place to guide future of USPTO:

1) Make it easiest for companies, experts and individuals to provide prior art. Examiners tare trained to crowd source prior art

2) Additional training for examiners - academics, in house and private practitioners are invited to come to USPTO to give pre-existing presentation on topic of their expertise – they will be streamed online for all USPTO staff to access.

3) Pro bono to be utilised more in order to improve patent system.

The total user experience: Improving the content and quality of your company's patent

application process post-AIA

  • Don't limit yourself to patenting the final product. If there is any type of interaction with a user, it might be a good angle to patent the product this way.
  • See: "Slide-to-unlock" invention
  • The key to consumers loving a product is consumers understanding the product. You can include a set of instructions to users in your patent application.

Life science panel: How to deal with an increasingly "activist" Supreme Court

  • Prevailing view on Supreme Court: Worrying
  • "The ball is rolling down the hill" - Court decisions may have much broader impact on industry than anticipated.
  • "Guidelines laid down by the PTO are horrifying to the industry" (Sherry Knowles, Knowles Intellectual Property Strategies)

ITC panel: Litigation and licensing

  • Exclusion orders are only the beginning. Once you get one, you have to make sure it's enforced properly.
  • Set up a meeting with CBT to assist them enforcing your exclusion order:
  • bring materials, samples, presentations
  • Exclusion orders are a lot of effort and work, but they are definitely worth it.

Litigation planning and forum shopping in Europe

  • You have to think about UPC right now, no matter if it comes into effect 2015 or 2020
  • Businesses plan 20 years ahead with (patent) strategy and investment, and UPC will have such a huge impact it needs to be incorporated in your strategy right now

India focus

  • India is a regulatory minefield
  • However, perception is much worse than reality
  • India is a social democracy, and therefore public health concerns will remain of importance. Still, this is limited to pharma and other sectors do not have to worry

Perspectives from the bench: The Inter-relationship between the District Courts, the

Federal Circuit, and the Supreme Court

  • Courts are not close enough – lack of understanding
  • Clerks are a great way to bridge gaps between different courts

Post grant proceedings

  • Very successful system so far
  • PTAB publishes valuable data and statistics freely available on their website
  • PTAB open to give advice and training on post-grant

Tackling the trolls: Legislative trends towards NPEs

  • Discussion focused on self-interest of the parties and not on reality
  • "Everyone who enforces a patent against me is a troll"

Legal developments in China

  • Legal system is improving very quickly
  • Plenty of opportunities out there
  • 80% of foreign enforcement actions are successful

Sponsors:

null        null


null      null


null      null      null

null      null


Supported by:

null    null    null
profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

RT @SethNorthrop: The @USPTO is blasted by watchdog for playing hooky, wasting money. https://t.co/nJBArE8NKg #iplaw #patents

Aug 31 2016 10:28 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

RT @MMLCResearch: Hashtags and emojis as trademarks and undue/due influence of social media platforms explored https://t.co/AOATxSh6DU

Aug 31 2016 10:22 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Kenyon's gone but IP boutique model isn't dead, as our look at firms born in the '60s shows https://t.co/6QQJM7Nqlv https://t.co/ujIqnodzNP

Aug 31 2016 04:30 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
More from the Managing IP blog


September 2016

The Mad Men of IP

In the early 1960s, patent practice was quiet and inventors often faced a hostile environment. But then, like now, new technologies were emerging to reshape business and the economy. Across North America, innovative lawyers set up boutique firms that would transform the market, many of which still exist today. Fifty years on, Jakob Schnaidt tells their story



Most read articles

Supplements