Patents Yearbook 2012

  • Editorial

  • Interview: Japan’s IP maverick

    Peter Ollier spoke with Toshiaki Iimura, presiding judge of the third division of Japan’s IP High Court, about patent validity, damages and why he keeps overturning JPO decisions

  • Roundtable: Standardising the standardisation process

    Dr Meir Pugatch reports on a roundtable of industry, offices and academia that explored how competition and innovation should interact in the standards process

  • Australia

    Robert Miller of Spruson & Ferguson answers questions about the idiosyncrasies of the Australian patent system, including innovation patents

  • The EPO

    The European Patent Office can provide a very efficient way to file across the EPC’s 38 states. Andrew Hammond of Valea explains

  • Greece

    Dr Helen Papaconstantinou of the firm Dr Helen Papaconstantinou, John Filias and Associates provides a guide to the policy of the OBI - the Greek Patent Office - and subsequent enforcement

  • Hong Kong

    Ho Chung Lui and Jacqueline Lui of Eagle IP discuss the particularities of filing and enforcement, including Hong Kong’s short-term patents

  • India

    Sujit Thakur and Naveen Varma of Zeus IP present an overview of the patent system, including foreign filing permissions

  • The Philippines

    Neptali Bulilan of Sapalo Velez Bundang & Bulilan explains the lack of pre- or post-grant opposition in the Philippines, as well as the rest of the filing and enforcement system

  • Singapore

    ATMD Bird & Bird provides an overview of the local patent system, including the importance of a positive examination report

  • South Africa

    Although South Africa is a non-examining country, there are various particularities to its patent system. By Jodi Coxwell of Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs

  • South Korea

    Tae Min Kim and Alice Young Choi from Kim & Chang look at the patent filing and enforcement process in Korea, with an explanation of the expedited examination system

  • Thailand

    It is important for applicants to understand the difference between petty patents and regular patents in Thailand. Nuttaphol Arammuang, Parichart Monaiyakul, Ajcharee Musiko, Jitluedee Siemanond and Titikaan Ungbhakorn of Tilleke & Gibbins explain

  • Vietnam

    Patent damages in Vietnam are normally capped at D500 million ($24,300), but you can also get up to D50 million for emotional damages. Pham Vu Khanh Toan of Pham & Associates explains the system


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements