UK: UK introduces changes to patent fees
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK: UK introduces changes to patent fees

The UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) has recently announced changes to UK patent fees. These changes follow a consultation period in 2017 and introduce some new fees as well as increasing existing fees. The changes will enter into force for UK patent applicants on April 6 2018.

The changes, related to filing, search, examination and grant affect both direct UK patent applications and UK national phase patent applications based on a corresponding international (Patent Cooperation Treaty) application. The changes to renewal fees will affect all granted UK patent applications, including those resulting from granted European patent applications.

Among these changes, the filing and search fees will both increase, alongside a new surcharge for the payment of the application fee after filing. Perhaps more significant is the introduction of a fee for excess claims. Under the previous fee structure, there was no financial penalty for filing a UK patent application with a large number of claims. However, under the changed fee structure, an excess claims fee of £20 for each claim over 25 claims will be payable alongside the search fee.

The changes also include a £20 increase to the examination fee and the introduction of a fee of £10 for each page of description over 35. Where an excess page fee is payable, this will be due alongside the examination fee. While the UK currently has no grant or issue fee for patents, after these fee changes, if the number of excess claims or excess pages increases during prosecution, a fee will be payable at grant composed of the additional excess claims fees and excess pages fees due.

Finally, as part of the changes, renewal fees for year 12 onwards will be increased by £10. Overall, the fee changes will more closely align the UKIPO's fee schedule and practice with that of the European Patent Office.

Despite these upcoming changes, fees at the UKIPO remain highly competitive relative to those of other similar sized economies. Therefore, the UK remains an attractive jurisdiction in which to file patent applications, especially for small and medium-sized businesses, and is a crucial territory within an IP strategy.

Chapman

Helga Chapman

Chapman IP

Kings Park House, 22 Kings Park Road

Southampton SO15 2AT

United Kingdom

Tel: +44 (0) 23 8000 2022 

info@chapmanip.com  

www.chapmanip.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As Australia’s Qantm IP leans towards being acquired by a private equity company, sources discuss what it could mean for IP firms
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
Pham Nghiem Xuan Bac, managing partner of Vision & Associates, discusses opportunities created by the US-China rift as well as profitability issues facing IP practices
Douglas Leite and two of his colleagues were intrigued by Bhering Advogados’s mission to grow its patent litigation practice
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Counsel explain how pricing flexibility, patent agents and being business partners can help them maintain profitable patent prosecution practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Speakers at an INTA event weighed in on why firms should create AI use policies and how they stay on top of the latest developments
The England and Wales Court of Appeal backed Lidl in its trademark dispute with Tesco, but we should pay more attention to how we rule on first-instance decisions
Richard Kempner, partner at Haseltine Lake Kempner, discusses the ‘remarkable’ comments from judges, despite the court finding against his client Tesco on the bulk of issues
Gift this article