InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

Africa: Declarations of intent to use in Mozambique




A serious issue has arisen around the system of the declaration of intent to use (DIU) in Mozambique.

In Mozambique, the proprietor of a trade mark registration needs to file a DIU every five years. It is important to understand that no actual use needs to be established, and that all the proprietor needs to do is declare its intention to use the trade mark. If the proprietor fails to file a DIU the registration remains valid, but it becomes unenforceable and remains unenforceable until such time as a DIU is eventually filed (if the DIU is filed out of time, actual use must be proved).

Worryingly, a practice seems to have arisen whereby local companies are applying for the cancellation of registrations for which no DIU has been filed, seemingly with a view to acquiring the trade marks. In many cases the proprietors of these trade marks do not even know that this is happening because they are not notified by the registry.

To add to the confusion, there is uncertainty as to the dates. The legislation states that, in the case of a national registration, the five-year period is calculated from the filing date, whereas in the case of an international registration (IR) it is calculated from the international registration date. However, the registry has issued a notice purporting to change the start date for IRs to the date of notification of the IR in Mozambique, something that it probably does not have the power to do.

Trade mark proprietors should therefore not avoid filing DIUs – companies that have not used their trade marks are sometimes wary of filing DIUs, but it is important to remember that the obligation is simply to file a statement of intent, not to establish actual use. Failure to file a DIU does render the registration unenforceable, and it may result in its cancellation.

Matthew Costard

Spoor & Fisher Jersey
Africa House, Castle Street
St Helier, Jersey JE4 9TW
Channel Islands
Tel: +44 1534 838000
Fax: +44 1534 838001
info@spoor.co.uk
www.spoor.com


Comments






profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

Yohan Liyanage of Linklaters says the Australian concept of "hottubbing" of experts "is something that has just com… https://t.co/1WOz8PtP6K

Dec 8 2017 09:48 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Nokia’s Adrian Howes discussing Huawei v ZTE in panel on FRAND and SEPs. “One of the big things coming out of the C… https://t.co/9qqJX1WIpR

Dec 8 2017 05:49 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Maximillian Haedicke of University of Freiburg reveals the equivalent of tea leaf reading in Germany is called coff… https://t.co/GNi9hYfKa4

Dec 8 2017 03:18 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
More from the Managing IP blog


null null null

null null null

October 2017

Courts grapple with scope of patent protection

The Supreme Court’s decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly introduced a doctrine of equivalents and arguably also established a doctrine of prosecution history estoppel in the UK. We look at the law across Europe, and the impact the decision might have. Kingsley Egbuonu, Michael Loney and James Nurton set the scene



Most read articles

Supplements