Germany: BGH “Filmscanner” judgment reviewed
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: BGH “Filmscanner” judgment reviewed

In its "Filmscanner" judgment, the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) deals with the question whether parties to a research and development cooperation owe a warranty obligation with regard to a shortcoming in the technical concept which prevents completion of the development. Moreover, the court deals with the treatment of such a conceptual shortcoming in case of divestment of the contractual legal position to a third party, where the decisive question is whether the third party can rescind the purchase agreement due to the failure of the development project resulting from the deficiency of the technical concept.

The cooperation agreement between the two original parties provides for the development of a film scanner for digitizing 35mm-movies. A contract clause specifies that no repayment obligations should arise in the event that it transpires, during the development, that the film scanner lacks technical feasibility.

The BGH concludes that the economic risk must be borne equally by both contractual parties since they were aware that a failure of the development project could occur, even immediately prior to completion of the entire development. The components to be developed by each of the parties and their interaction should have been functional. Therefore, the BGH considers that a warranty obligation of one of the two parties for a conceptual deficiency is not given.

According to the BGH, it cannot be concluded that an agreement between the party divesting its legal position and the third party acquiring this position is based on the same risk distribution. An agreement might have been reached for a specific level of development of the technical concept, from which a warranty obligation arises for the feasibility of the development project.

However, only if the parties to the purchase agreement ascribe specific properties to the previous development work carried out by the original parties, as well as their results, which they do not actually have, can a warranty obligation of the transferor come into question. The unilateral expectation or notion of the purchaser about the level of development already achieved is insufficient; even if these are supported by information from the transferor who presents the development success as being possible.

The "Filmscanner" judgment illustrates once again to the parties to a development cooperation agreement and their successors the importance of having precise contractual agreements about development activities rendered and those still to be performed, so as not to face unexpected economic risks in the event of project failure.

stief.jpg
fuchs.jpg

Marco
Stief

Stefan G
Fuchs


Maiwald Patentanwalts GmbHElisenhof, Elisenstr 3D-80335, Munich, GermanyTel: +49 89 74 72 660 Fax: +49 89 77 64 24info@maiwald.euwww.maiwald.eu

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

AI
Tennessee has passed the ELVIS Act, a law that fights against AI models that mimic the voice and likeness of music artists
Rob Stien, chief communications and public policy officer at InterDigital, says the EU has forgotten innovators while trying to solve an issue that doesn’t exist
As Australia’s Qantm IP leans towards being acquired by a private equity company, sources discuss what it could mean for IP firms
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
Nghiem Xuan Bac Pham, managing partner of Vision & Associates, discusses opportunities created by the US-China rift as well as profitability issues facing IP practices
Douglas Leite and two of his colleagues were intrigued by Bhering Advogados’s mission to grow its patent litigation practice
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Counsel explain how pricing flexibility, patent agents and being business partners can help them maintain profitable patent prosecution practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Speakers at an INTA event weighed in on why firms should create AI use policies and how they stay on top of the latest developments
Gift this article