Competition law poses new threat to pharma


Hiding prior art or data could increasingly lead to legal action under EU competition law. Peter Crowther and Gareth Morgan explain why the threat is so broad

During patent prosecution, companies routinely make representations to a patent office as to the extent of the prior art of which they are aware; it is not unusual to omit details that could be prejudicial to the grant of a patent. Likewise, data presented in a patent document may be cherry picked from experimental data so that only those that happen to support the patent document's key claim are included. While this is not illegal, and in Europe there is no formal offence of "fraud on the patent office" as there is in the United States, recent competition law developments indicate that competition authorities and parties suffering loss from an abuse of a dominant position may proceed against a patentee who has behaved in this manner....



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


More from the Managing IP blog


Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the the 135th INTA Annual Meeting in Dallas


 

 

 

 


May 2013

Look behind the salaries

A survey of the largest IP practices in the US reveals rising compensation, but only at general-practice firms. And partners are having a hard time everywhere. Alli Pyrah explains who is hiring and what lawyers they need



Most read articles

Poll

Following the US Apple v Samsung trial, do you think juries should play a role in patent cases?







Supplements