Copyright Amendment Bill passed




The bill amending the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957, pending in the Parliament since 2010, has finally been passed. While this bill continues to have several detractors, it was passed unanimously by the Parliament. The President of India has given assent to the bill.

In a move that had extremely controversial origins, the bill amends Sections 18 and 19 of the existing Act, whereby authors of literary and musical works included in cinematograph films are prohibited from assigning (or waiving) their right to receive royalties for any form of utilisation of the works, except the performance or exhibition of the works as part of the cinematograph film in a cinema hall. In the context of sound recordings, this prohibition applies to any and all forms of exploitation of the works.

In an effort to keep up with the current trends, the bill introduces Section 65A, making it a criminal offence to circumvent an effective "technological measure" with the intent of infringing the rights protected by the Act. The bill also introduces Section 65B that criminalises tampering with rights management information (RMI) and distributing such tampered products.

While "technological measure" is undefined, RMI has been defined to refer to details and information intended to identify author, source, terms of licence etc associated with the work. The bill also provides some degree of safe harbour to digital intermediaries – transient or incidental storage of a work or performance purely in the technical process of electronic transmission or communication to the public is not an infringement anymore.

Similarly, there also appears to be some degree of protection for search engines: transient or incidental storage of a work or performance for the purpose of providing electronic links, access or integration, where such links, access or integration have not been expressly prohibited by the right holder, is not considered as an act of infringement. This exception is subject to a take-down procedure that is intended to provide instant relief to rights holders for a period of 21 days.

The bill brings about many other substantive changes to the Act, including expanding the scope of the exceptions to copyright infringement, specifying the need for a court order to continue detention of imported goods by the Customs authority beyond 14 days and extending the term of protection for photographs.

V Lakshmikumaran

Lakshmi Kumaran & Sridharan
B6/10 Safdarjung Enclave
New Delhi 110029 INDIA
Tel: +91 11 41299800
Fax: +91 11 41299899
vlakshmi@lakshmisri.com
www.lslaw.in




More from the Managing IP blog


Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the the 135th INTA Annual Meeting in Dallas


 

 

 

 


May 2013

Look behind the salaries

A survey of the largest IP practices in the US reveals rising compensation, but only at general-practice firms. And partners are having a hard time everywhere. Alli Pyrah explains who is hiring and what lawyers they need



Most read articles

Poll

Following the US Apple v Samsung trial, do you think juries should play a role in patent cases?







Supplements