Philippines joins the Madrid Protocol




On April 25 2012 the President of the Philippines, Benigno Aquino III, signed the Instrument of Accession of the Philippines to the Madrid Protocol, which is expected to take effect in the Philippines on July 25 2012. Prior to this date, the Intellectual Property Office (IPOPHL) prepared for the accession by improving its trade mark registration processing time, and meeting with various stakeholders to explain the system, and obtain reactions to it.

The Joint Foreign Chambers of Commerce (JFC) in the Philippines is in agreement with the accession since it would make trade mark registration easier, faster and less expensive, and will ensure that the country maintains a competitive advantage considering that its main trading partners such as the United States, EU, Japan, Australia, Korea and Singapore are already members of the Protocol. As early as October 2010, the Philippine Chamber of Commerce passed a resolution urging the Philippine Senate to ratify accession to the Madrid Protocol.

To date, the IPOPHL has not come out with any possible amendments to the IP Code or its rules that would harmonise provisions not compatible with those of the Madrid Protocol, such as filing declarations of use. The Philippines joins two members of the ASEAN, Singapore and Vietnam, in the Protocol. All the ASEAN member states have agreed under the ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint to accede to the Protocol by 2015.

Editha R Hechanova

Hechanova Bugay & Vilchez
GF Chemphil Building Antonio Arnaiz Ave
Makati City 1223
Philippines
Tel: +63 2 888 4293
Fax: +63 2 888 4290
editharh@info.com.ph




More from the Managing IP blog


Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the the 135th INTA Annual Meeting in Dallas


 

 

 

 


May 2013

Look behind the salaries

A survey of the largest IP practices in the US reveals rising compensation, but only at general-practice firms. And partners are having a hard time everywhere. Alli Pyrah explains who is hiring and what lawyers they need



Most read articles

Poll

Following the US Apple v Samsung trial, do you think juries should play a role in patent cases?







Supplements