New patent legislation enacted




The substantive amendments to the Patents Act, encompassed in the Intellectual Property Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act, have recently entered into force.

The new legislation enacts a number of substantive changes to our system. These include the adoption of a European-style obviousness standard where material from anywhere in the world can be used in establishing obviousness. This will allow examiners to take objections on obviousness where the primary prior art document was unlikely to be found by the skilled person in the art in Australia.

The amendments also provide for a somewhat controversial and broad experimental-use exemption to patent infringement. The terms of the permitted experimental use include "improving or modifying the invention". The legislation would appear to directly encourage "inventing around" activities to eliminate opportunities for avoid infringement. Given Australia does not subscribe to the "doctrine of equivalents" principles of the United States, it may provide strong incentives for the wily infringer to implement an invention-around programme.

The Patent Office has also sought to reduce examination times for consideration of amendments and arguments and to reduce the applicant's ability to file a divisional application to keep a case alive (a Request for Continued Examination-type continuation application) when the reduced examination period runs out.

Peter Treloar

Shelston IP
Level 21, 60 Margaret Street
Sydney NSW 2000, Australia
Tel: +61 2 9777 1111
Fax: +61 2 9241 4666
email@shelstonip.com
www.shelstonip.com




More from the Managing IP blog


Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the the 135th INTA Annual Meeting in Dallas


 

 

 

 


May 2013

Look behind the salaries

A survey of the largest IP practices in the US reveals rising compensation, but only at general-practice firms. And partners are having a hard time everywhere. Alli Pyrah explains who is hiring and what lawyers they need



Most read articles

Poll

Following the US Apple v Samsung trial, do you think juries should play a role in patent cases?







Supplements