A cake for the beloved mother in law

27 January 2012

Mothers in law inspire many stories. And while the relations between the members of a household are always a very intimate thing, relations between a mother in law and a son in law are a particular phenomenon. Suffice it to say that the internet contains a voluminous site dedicated to stories about mothers in law.


A Russian son in law recently made a contribution to this worldwide tradition. He registered a design patent for a cake. The design would have gone unnoticed if not for its peculiar name. The description of the patent gives the name of the cake as "A cake for the beloved mother in law". An attempt by a son in law to express his love to his new mother? Perhaps. But let us look at the cake more closely. Do the white dots covering the red caps remind you of anything? Exactly. For those unfamiliar with mycology, the inventor sincerely explains in the specification for the patent that the particular features are three dimensional elements shaped as boletuses and toadstools with stalks covered with crumbs. Toadstools are poisonous. One may appreciate the black humour of the inventor and only hope that his activities were not inspired by his family life.

Anyway, the patent ceased to be effective because the patent owner did not pay the maintenance fee. Was that because he ate the cake himself, or felt remorse? Let us hope for the latter.

Vladimir Biriulin

Gorodissky & Partners
Russia 129010, Moscow
B. Spasskaya Str
25, stroenie 3
Tel: +7 495 937 6116 / 6109
Fax: +7 495 937 6104 / 6123
pat@gorodissky.ru
www.gorodissky.com


Bookmarks



INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements