New gTLD rules as application period opens

28 January 2012

Edward Conlon, London

On January 12 the first round of applications for new gTLDs opened, with last-minute concessions from Icann. But were they enough to placate governments and brand owners? Edward Conlon reports

Native Americans can get their money back

As the first round of applications for new gTLDs opened, Icann made concessions to poor applicants and to governments in its handbooks. But it refused to clarify when a second round would start, bringing greater uncertainty.

The concession to governments' ability to block gTLDs came in Icann's ninth Applicant Guidebook, released on January 11. Various politicians have been pushing for greater powers in order to block gTLDs that violate national laws or are culturally sensitive.

The Guidebook makes a number of minor changes from September's edition, but one significant change is that it hands more power to Icann's Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC), particularly representatives from smaller countries. The GAC will no longer have to clarify how it achieves consensus before asking Icann to block gTLDs – which it can do during a seven-month objection period beginning in May. And it appears that only...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements