How do we avoid liability for online IP infringement?

01 July 2010

My company wants to set up a website or blog that allows the public to post their own content. How do I make sure we are not held liable for any IP infringements?

The professor

We certainly live in interesting times in terms of secondary liability for user-driven content. We have recently seen the YouTube case decided, and the appeal in that case should shed further light on the issue. Similarly, some of these issues were addressed in the Rescuecom case on trade mark infringement.

From a corporate point-of-view, I think if you invite users to contribute to your site, provided you're not monetising the content, and it's an incidental reason for going to the site, as a practical matter you shouldn't have much of a problem. Most IP owners will be thrilled if you simply take down any infringing content in response to a letter and will not take the matter any further.

One issue to consider is how you monitor the contributions. Monitoring is a two-edged sword. It is good if you don't allow infringing content in, but it can be...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements