Global awards 2010

01 July 2010

Managing IP celebrated the winners of its 2010 awards at a dinner at the Dorchester, London

More than 250 guests attended Managing IP's fifth annual Global Awards Dinner at the Dorchester in London at the end of June, which IP lawyers and patent attorneys coming from as far away as China, Colombia, Mexico and Australia.

More than 50 awards were presented to the leading firms in Europe, Asia and Latin America at the black-tie dinner. The magazine also presented special awards recognising global anti-counterfeiting work and pan-European work in life sciences, new media/internet, patent and trade mark. Baker & McKenzie and Bird & Bird each won three awards.

GlaxoSmithKline was named in-house team of the year and the team's award was presented by the evening's sponsors Adamson and Partners. The company's intellectual property team was recognised for its advocacy in response to the European Commission's inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry, its initiatives to make its drugs more accessible in developing countries and for its legal actions...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements