Avoid the marking troll

01 April 2010

The false marking troll is on the prowl following two recent court rulings. Thomas Turano advises companies how to steer clear of these clever critters

In December 2009, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in Forest Group v The Bon Tool Company that the fine for falsely marking a product as patented should be applied on a per article, rather than a per product line basis. As a result of this holding, a district court must now determine how many products sold were falsely marked with intent to deceive and use that number in calculating the fine. While the underlying facts of the district court case did not initially seem to have serious repercussions for US companies, subsequent events have proven it to be a landmark case....



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements