Drug settlement deals under attack

01 February 2010

US and EU antitrust regulators have toughened their stance against deals between generic and originator drugs companies

Emma Barraclough, London and Eileen McDermott, New York

Antitrust regulators on both sides of the Atlantic toughened their stance against deals between generic and originator drugs companies last month.

The European Commission confirmed that it has asked pharmaceutical companies to hand over copies of settlement deals they have agreed over the past 18 months.

It has not revealed which companies have been sent the requests for information, but said that the requests cover patent settlement deals struck between July 1 2008 and December 31 last year covering the EU and European Economic Area.

The Commission said it is particularly interested in deals where an originator company has paid a generic rival in return for delayed entry on to the market of a generic drug.

The outgoing Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes said that the Commission wanted to monitor these kind of deals to "better understand" why, by whom and under which...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements