Managing IP

ManagingIP

RT @IP_STARS: For those who need detailed analysis of the issues in Germany (& #UPC criticisms), here are 4 articles to read: (1) https://t…

Aug 17 2017 11:01 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite

@jezzamarc Looks like it doesn't it? Wonder if this will be terminal?

Aug 17 2017 10:51 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite

RT @BrandsAndStuff: If an AI creates a work of art, who owns the copyright? | World Economic Forum https://t.co/SLxTkG27xA

Aug 17 2017 10:13 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite

Join the conversation

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

• 2017

  • August

    • Attorneys’ fees, Federal Circuit, will.i.am, EFF, Erich Spangenberg, CRISPR, Prism, Philips, ITC, Qualcomm, Apple, Aqua IP Investor Pool – the week in IP

    • CRISPR, Apple, Nokia, Blockchain patents, Dominion Harbor, Quincy Jones, TC Heartland – the week in IP

  • July

    • Copycat car makers and the role of design rights

    • Apple, WARF, Qualcomm, Google, Richard Prince, CLASSICS Act, STRONGER Patents Act, Tam – the week in IP

    • Brexit and EU registered rights - a fantasy

    • News and photos from IP Out event in London

    • Monkey selfie, Teva, Apotex, CRISPR patent pool, Eli Lilly, Jawbone, Shipping and Transit – the week in IP

    • Qualcomm, Apple, TTAB, High Tech Inventors Alliance, Waymo, Uber, Shipping & Transit, Federal Circuit, PTAB, Humira, Intellectual Ventures – the week in IP

    • Why PTAB’s double threat is not causing panic yet

    • Canada’s big week for patent news

    • Sir Paul McCartney, Washington Redskins, Federal Circuit, Newegg, Xiaomi, Nokia, Nike, Rob Gronkowski, USPTO, Kyle Bass – the week in IP

  • June

    • Report reveals growing importance of trade secrets

    • Qualcomm, Section 2(a), Federal Circuit, TC Heartland, ZoomEssence, USPTO director rumours – the week in IP

    • Read our bumper mid-year issue online now!

    • Your guide to a busy SCOTUS term for IP cases

    • Jersey Boys, GSK, Teva, Gene Simmons, Imagine, top universities for patents, Texas trade secrets – the week in IP

    • TC Heartland, House Judiciary Committee, Uber, Waymo, monkey selfie, patent news coverage – the week in IP

    • Read the May issue online

    • Michelle Lee, IPO 2016 US patent owners list, Sanofi, Amgen, Puma, Forever 21, TC Heartland and 101 rulings, Apple, WARF – the week in IP

    • The week in IP – Nokia, Apple, Spotify, PTAB, Abbvie, BlackBerry, Qualcomm, IP Czar, Trump budget, Uber, District of Delaware

    • Good things come to those who wait at INTA

  • May

    • The corporate IP stars of 2017

    • Women in IP annual reception 2017, Barcelona

    • Procedural, not legal, issues will be key to UPC success

    • The growing disparity between NPE and practicing entity patent damages

    • Qualcomm, Waymo, Uber, Amgen, Conan O’Brien, Cloudflare, Blackbird Tech, PTAB – the week in IP

    • Eagles, Wi-Fi One, hashtag trade marks, emojis, Dancing Baby – the week in IP

    • US patent litigation springs up in April

    • All set for Barcelona?

    • Representation in the UPC

    • World IP Day, Google, Intertrust Technologies, USTR Special 301 Report, Qualcomm, Apple, PTAB – the week in IP

    • Read the Europe IP Focus 2017 for free

  • April

    • IP Strategy Forum held in London

    • The art of IP war

    • Abbott and Costello, top patent law firms, FTC, Snap, Richard Prince – the week in IP

    • Read our latest issues in digital format

    • Intellectual Ventures, WiLAN, CRISPR appeal, Apple, Unwired Planet, Trump trade marks, EFF – the week in IP

    • Ed Sheeran, Marathon Patent Group, Forever 21, Puma, Marijuanaville, Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator, LOT Network –the week in IP

    • Unwired Planet v Google, Q1 PTAB and district court filing, Hefty/Glad false advertising dispute, USPTO leadership, International AntiCounterfeiting Coalition – the week in IP

    • Global and North America awards – the winners have all been revealed

    • Section 101’s future and other highlights from the April 2017 issue

    • Spain's Culture Plan 2020 and the fight against piracy

  • March

    • Microsoft, Toyota, USPTO, LG, Marrakesh treaty, Kanye West, Beijing Intellectual Property Court, Crystal Head Vodka – the week in IP

    • Guest post: About the IEEE, but no longer without the IEEE

    • Ivanka Trump and protecting personal brands in China

    • PTAB issues last Coalition for Affordable Drugs written decision

    • FilmOn, Supreme Court, patent sales, Stairway to Heaven, Blockchain Intellectual Property Council, Adidas, Juicy Couture – the week in IP

    • New articles on patent and trade mark developments in China

    • Make your nominations for the Global Anti-Counterfeiting Awards 2017

    • IP Inclusive wins first corporate social responsibility award

    • Whirlpool, Acorda, Kyle Bass, Michelle Lee, Google, Uber, copyright lawsuits, IP Commission Report – the week in IP

    • New views on Brexit at CITMA meeting

    • A discussion on second medical use patents

    • Prenda Law, Perfect 10, USPTO, Niro, Forever 21, Adidas – the week in IP

    • A preview of this week's International Patent Forum

    • Highlights from the March 2017 issue

    • Google, Uber, Defend Trade Secrets Act, Kyle Bass, Alibaba, PTAB – the week in IP

  • February

    • Genentech, Amgen, SiriusXM, Eastern District of Texas, Donald Trump, BlackBerry, Nokia – the week in IP

    • CRISPR interference decision, Center for Intellectual Property Understanding, Alibaba, Section 101, Northern District of California – the week in IP

    • Apple, Samsung, Oculus, Facebook, US Chamber of Commerce IP Index, Amazon – the week in IP

    • SCOTUS nominee Neil Gorsuch, Teva, Apple, Qualcomm, PTAB, NFL-related litigation – the week in IP

  • January

    • Guest post and infographic: Analysing the PTAB in 2016

    • Trump: the pro-patent president?

    • Apple, Qualcomm, Sir Paul McCartney, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Star Trek, TTAB, Niro Law – the week in IP

    • Can the UPC really be ready to launch in December?

    • Qualcomm, antitrust guidelines, AAP, motions to transfer venue, Biogen, TTAB, Samsung v Apple – the week in IP

    • Guest post: Corporate secrets in an age of innovation

    • USPTO director speculation, Amgen injunction win, software copyright litigation, top global innovators, 2016 reviews – the week in IP

    • Book now for upcoming events and awards dinners

    • Back by popular demand: MIP International Women’s Leadership Forum 2017

    • Some IP stories you may have missed over the holiday period

• 2016

  • December

    • ASIPI dances the tango

    • Sponsored post: Leveraging exclusion orders to block patent-infringing products from entering the US

    • Annual survey reveals top firms for PCT work

    • Kit Kat, Glee, UPC, Hong Kong and more - the week in IP

    • Read up to five articles on managingip.com for free!

    • Guest post: ARIPO proposes Harare Protocol amendments

    • 2016 US patent case filing update

    • Duran Duran, Iceland, USPTO, GIPC IP Champions, Canada copyright – the week in IP

    • Sponsored post: Copyright notices as prima facie evidence of public accessibility

  • November

    • The latest IP developments in Brazil and Mexico

    • SiriusXM, Jersey Boys, Apple v Samsung, TiVo, Netflix, PTAB, trade secrets at the ITC – the week in IP

    • ITMA becomes CITMA

    • Expert witnesses in patent litigation around the world

    • INTA Brussels marks 10th anniversary with Digital World conference

    • Federal Circuit, TTAB, Toronto Maple Leafs, Snoop Dogg, We Shall Overcome, PTAB, patent cited references – the week in IP

    • Flo & Eddie, SiriusXM, Usher, Justin Bieber, women inventors, Donald Trump, Amazon, Cuba trade marks – the week in IP

    • Meet Managing IP during November and December

    • Intellectual property under President Trump

    • Mastering relationships is the key to lasting success - guest post

    • USPTO, DMCA safe harbours, Shipping & Transit, Copyright Act exemptions, Samsung, TiVo – the week in IP

    • USPTO releases update to 101 guidance

    • Join us this month for webinars on trade secrets and Halo

  • October

    • USPTO, Uptown Funk, Kyle Bass, PTAB, Maria Pallante, Dancing Baby – the week in IP

    • Read all the latest news from the AIPLA Annual Meeting

    • Concern and confusion at the US Copyright Office

    • 101 rulings, FTC’s PAE report, Redskins, Cuba, Flanax, Apple, Amazon – the week in IP

    • Brexit and the Unitary Patent: where are we now?

    • Patent eligibility decisions, USPTO, Supreme Court, Lucasfilm, forum shopping, Qualcomm – the week in IP

    • PTAB most active forum for US patent disputes

    • Who’s on First?, Federal Circuit, global patent trends, PTAB, WIPO, Ghostface Killah, Kanye West – the week in IP

    • US patent litigation falls 13% in third quarter

    • Washington Redskins, USPTO fee increases, Patents for Humanity, Marrakesh Treaty, Eastern District of Texas – the week in IP

  • September

    • How to protect innovation under sharing economics

    • Special focus on PTAB in our October issue

    • Oracle, FCC, IP-intensive industries report, biosimilars, PTAB, Scotch whisky – the week in IP

    • Guest post: New thoughts on South Africa's IP policy

    • BMI, Redskins, The Slants, Judge Newman, UN medicines report, High Court of Delhi – the week in IP

    • Read the highlights from the AIPPI World Congress

    • Pondering four years of PTAB proceedings

    • Supporting IP education in Africa

    • PTAB, VirnetX, Teva, 101 invalidation data, software patents, blockchain technology – the week in IP

    • Managing IP webinars coming up soon

    • US patent litigation update: filing falls in August

    • Guest post: Improving patent analysis with big data

    • Slowly, a post-Brexit picture will emerge

    • USPTO, Lindsay Lohan, EFF, Mexico’s opposition system, Argentina’s INPI, Louis Vuitton, Warner Bros – the week in IP

  • August

    • Kenyon comes to end of road but IP boutique model not dead

    • Webinar: IP Stars 2017

    • Blurred Lines, Teva, Trader Joe’s, Eastern District of Texas, Intellectual Ventures, Cox – the week in IP

    • Sponsored post: Telematics patent landscape pre- and post-Alice

    • Share your views on IP strategy

    • Guest post: Is now the time for intangible assets to take the stage?

    • Oracle, Google, USPTO, Happy Birthday, Microsoft, Lenovo, Rovi, Dish Network, FTC – the week in IP

    • Managing IP out and about over the coming months

    • Ray Niro tributes, Marathon Patent Group, Ed Sheeran, Ghostface Killah, LOT Network, Alexander Wang – the week in IP

    • Join us for UPC, Unitary Patent and Brexit discussions in Munich and Paris

    • Sponsored post: Lowering the (on sale) bar

    • Guest post: Designs, Brexit and the fashion industry

    • Analysing the PTAB in the first half of 2016 – guest post

    • Blackberry, TD Ameritrade, Dell, Network-1, ASCAP, BMI, Whole Foods, Qualcomm, Led Zeppelin – the week in IP

    • The Olympics and IP

    • Sponsored post: Mandatory post-approval biosimilar notice implicates millions

    • Getty, top patent practitioner companies, Donald Trump, venue reform, Stephen Colbert – the week in IP

  • July

    • Patent litigation cools in the Eastern District of Texas

    • Yahoo, top patent practitioner firms, Fitbit, Jawbone, PTAB, Canada, Led Zeppelin, Eastern District of Texas – the week in IP

    • Guest post: Keeping the record straight

    • GAO releases two patent reports

    • Have you explored our topic pages recently?

    • Nokia, Samsung, patent venue reform, Adidas, Skechers, Guangzhou IP Court, Yahoo, Pokémon Go – the week in IP

    • Africa IP news round-up (July 2016)

    • Guest post: A smoother road thanks to TM5 harmonisation efforts

    • Has the PTAB peaked already?

    • Users of Madrid System warned about problems

    • ASEAN and more in our bumper mid-year issue

    • Craft beer disputes, Stairway to Heaven, Kim Dotcom, Nike, WWE, PTAB, Thomson Reuters – the week in IP

    • Pharma sales - obvious(ly) due to 'blocking' patents? (sponsored)

    • US patent litigation, Google, Oracle, Brexit, Led Zeppelin, McDonald’s, top patent filers – the week in IP

    • Guest post: Brexit and SEPs

  • June

    • Guest post: Why evidence and experts matter

    • Brexit, Hillary Clinton, Alibaba, Qualcomm, Happy Birthday, Federal Circuit, Converse – the week in IP

    • US Supreme Court to hear Life Technologies case but denies Sequenom

    • Brexit and IP: a primer

    • Ranking the IP rankings

    • Brexit, PCT, FC Barcelona, VOB and WIBL – our weekly IP roundup

    • Supreme Court’s Halo opinion, Oracle v Google, Ed Sheeran, Axl Rose, Eastern District of Texas, M&M’s – the week in IP

    • View our webinar on "PTAB Trials by the Numbers"

    • Latest IP developments in Asia

    • Is the PTAB too unfair on motions to amend?

    • Pre-1972 recordings, Canada plain packaging, Microsoft, top 10 US patent cases, TTAB fees, Federal Circuit – the week in IP

    • The week in IP – bumper edition!

    • Women in IP Network Annual Reception

  • May

    • Read the highlights from the INTA Annual Meeting

    • Managing IP at the INTA Annual Meeting

    • US patent grants fell last year for first time since 2008 – PwC report

    • Trade mark Stars and firm analyses published

    • Adidas, Under Armour, PTAB amendments, Facebook, patent trolls, .blog, limericks – the week in IP

    • Highlights from the May 2016 issue

    • Guest post: Five common mistakes of early-stage tech companies

    • Nvidia, Samsung, Oracle, Google, iPhone, Eastern District of Texas, TTAB – the week in IP

    • USPTO updates patent subject matter eligibility guidance

    • Is the PTAB more balanced than patent owners think?

    • US Supreme Court takes on two more IP cases

    • USTR special 301 report, Redskins, Klingon, Jawbone, Fitbit, copyright reform – the week in IP

  • April

    • Guest post: New Norwegian Copyright Act proposed

    • Celebrating World IP Day

    • The Slants, Supreme Court, Prince, Adidas, Ecco, Alice – the week in IP

    • Guest post: The economic impact of the global trade in counterfeit goods

    • Yahoo’s patent portfolio, pre-1972 sound recordings, Section 101, Alibaba, Facebook, USPTO – the week in IP

    • Guest post: Why the CJEU is learning on the job

    • What's inside our April issue

    • Google, Unwired Planet, Burberry, JC Penney, post-Form 18 patent complaints, Led Zeppelin – the week in IP

    • View our webinar on Magic IP Strategy Answers for IP Counsel

    • Now online: IP Stars 2016 Copyright Rankings

    • ITC, trade secrets, PTAB, Form 18 elimination, design patents – the takeaways from our US Patent Forum

    • Sponsored post: Belmora LLC v Bayer Consumer Care AG et al

    • ClearCorrect, GSK, DMCA reform, Pele, Samsung, EFF – the week in IP

  • March

    • Make your nominations for the Global Anti-Counterfeiting Awards 2016

    • Sequenom, Cuozzo, Marrakesh Treaty, John Cleese, Apple, Samsung, The Beatles – the week in IP

    • Join our first Africa Roadshow in NYC or via the web

    • Dancing Baby, RPX, Uniloc, Acacia, Adidas, Skechers, WIPO, Yosemite – the week in IP

    • Why we've signed up to IP Inclusive

    • Sponsored statement: Foreign patent filing guides released

    • All the news and photos from Awards season

    • PTAB, utility models and patent rankings - highlights from the March issue

    • Latest IP developments in Turkey

    • Guest post: Future double patent protection in Germany

    • Now online: IP STARS 2016 patent rankings

  • February

    • Judge Koh, WIPO, Dominion Harbor, WiLAN, Marathon, Uniloc, Copyright Royalty Board, Booking.com, Disney – the week in IP

    • Guest post: Tackling IP unknowns is fundamental to oil and gas tech expansion

    • Fox News, The Hurt Locker, Justice Scalia, Lenovo, Qualcomm, Novak Druce – the week in IP

    • Guest post: UNIFAB raises terrorism concerns in fight against counterfeits

    • Happy Birthday, Burberry, JC Penney, banking patents, Fox, Dish Network, US Senate, Authors Guild appeal – the week in IP

    • US Chamber of Commerce releases international IP index

    • Tattoo copyright, Bacardi, Havana Club, IKEA, Marrakesh Treaty, Nokia, Judge Lucy Koh, NewEgg, more animal selfies – the week in IP

    • How to enter Europe's new design awards

    • Now online: IP Stars 2016 trade mark rankings

  • January

    • Immoral marks, New York Times, Cuozzo, PTAB, Microsoft – the week in IP

    • A year of change in Europe

    • Last chance to take part in the Global IP Index

    • TTAB, Eastern District of Texas, Apple, Samsung, Batmobile, Marilyn Monroe – the week in IP

    • Guest post: Innovation and the case for confidence

    • Star Wars, Erich Spangenberg, The Trademark Company, IP licensing, Spotify, PTAB, David Bowie – the week in IP

    • US Supreme Court to hear Cuozzo and Kirtsaeng cases

    • Some practical questions about the UPC

    • Trade mark litigation, Apple, Samsung, monkey selfie, Richard Prince, Anne Frank, hoverboards – the week in IP

    • The final 2015 US patent litigation and PTAB filing figures

    • What Managing IP has in store in 2016

• 2015

  • December

    • Battistelli defiant in interview about EPO reforms

    • Kyle Bass’s success rate at the PTAB – an update

    • Gillette, Dollar Shave Club, Fitbit, Jawbone, Abbott and Costello, Happy Birthday, patent litigation – the week in IP

    • The calm after the US patent litigation storm

    • The A-Z of IP In 2015

    • What effect will the TPP have on your country?

    • Judges, more judges and IP in literature

    • Jeremy Phillips, design awards, IP Australia, IP Inclusive and a special offer – the week in IP

  • November

    • Join us for the European Patent Forum USA in New York and San Jose

    • Apple, ContentGuard, Samsung, The Medicines Company, Google, Lex Machina, Skechers, Converse – the week in IP

    • Legislative overhauls, injunctions and patent eligibility in Canada

    • Time to talk about Brexit

    • Celgene win leaves Bass even in PTAB institution game

    • Taylor Swift, Mark Cuban, Happy Birthday, Judge Gilstrap, In-N-Out Burger – the week in IP

    • Guest post: A European perspective on the CAD

    • Why China watchers need to pay attention to IP

    • Washington Redskins, GoPro, DraftKings, FanDuel, patent litigation spike, Alice stats, monkey selfie – the week in IP

    • The latest around the Asia-Pacific

    • Guest post: China’s patent revolution - from imitation to innovation

    • View our webinar on obviousness in US district courts and PTAB

    • Could a computer do your job?

  • October

    • EFF, TXED, DMCA exceptions, TPP, SAP, Google, 1984 – the week in IP

    • Takeaways from the AIPLA Annual Meeting

    • Apple, patent trolls, Jay Z, Pandora, Kyle Bass, cheerleading uniforms – the week in IP

    • Signs of our times: introducing universal sign marks

    • DSM, patent box, WIPO and EPO: European news roundup

    • Guest post: UK and China join forces to strengthen IP protection

    • Eight highlights from the AIPPI Congress in Rio de Janeiro

    • Apple, Best Global Brands, Steve Jobs movie, USPTO Silicon Valley office, Marrakesh Treaty – the week in IP

    • Africa and the Middle East IP news round-up, October 2015

    • TPP, Cuozzo, Bikram Yoga, hedge fund IPRs, Samsung, Nvidia – the week in IP

    • Looking ahead to the AIPPI Congress

    • IP Stars surveys now underway

    • Apple, Samsung, Erich Spangenberg, Depomed, Alibaba, Jay-Z, Kanye West, more monkey selfie – the week in IP

  • September

    • Seven takeaways from the Luxury Brands & Retail Forum

    • Monkey selfie, Batmobile, Mark Cuban, Inventist, Lindt, Haribo, All About That Bass – the week in IP

    • The pros and cons of the Madrid Protocol

    • Annual Patent & IP Trends Report Released (Sponsored Statement)

    • Join our next webinar on the Madrid Protocol

    • Kim Dotcom, Rick Ross, Segway, Adidas, Skechers – the week in IP

    • MARQUES Annual Conference, Vienna 2015: Day 1 round-up

    • Fitbit, Jawbone, US Copyright Office, BMI, TiVo, Samsung, Toyota – the week in IP

    • Kyle Bass vows to keep returning to the PTAB “kangaroo court”

    • Show us the evidence!

    • Your IP Stars research questions answered

    • Trade mark cluttering, Olympic logo, EMI amnesty, Crestor and Ariosa – the week in brief

  • August

    • How IP practice is changing

    • Sequenom, Ariosa, Eastern District of Texas, Ashley Madison, Washington Redskins, Led Zeppelin – the week in IP

    • MARQUES Annual Conference, Vienna 2015: Day 1 round-up

    • Patents, innovation and The Economist

    • Samsung, Apple, Google, BMW, Pom Wonderful, Pur Beverages, UK’s Intellectual Property Crime Unit, Uber – the week in IP

    • Find out about the research for the 2016 IP Stars

    • US copyright litigation report reveals file sharing cases now outnumber all others

    • Google, The Economist, Airbus, The Simpsons, Cecil the Lion – the week in IP

    • IP news summer roundup: Asia and Africa

    • IP news summer round up: Europe

    • USPTO teleworking, Happy Birthday, TTAB, Michael Jordan, Qualcomm, ParkerVision – the week in IP

  • July

    • Celgene files motion for sanctions against Kyle Bass

    • Meet our most diverse MIP 50 ever

    • Why Twitter is not seeing the funny side to copying tweets

    • Google, customer stays, Apple, Samsung, Oracle, TTAB – the week in IP

    • Tell MARQUES about yourself and win a bottle of Cremant

    • Join Managing IP's upcoming Asia events

    • Patent reform, Blurred Lines, USPTO, Newegg, trade mark filing, RPX – the week in IP

    • US patent litigation back with a bang in May and June

    • Learn about the latest luxury goods law

    • SiriusXM, Facebook, Fox, Zorro, orphan works – the week in IP

    • IPO releases lists of top organisations and universities granted US patents

    • IP in Asia (2) – four takeaways

    • Battle of the IP bands, Google v Oracle, Taylor Swift, Section 101 judgments, Eli Lilly – the week in IP

    • IP Stars listings and analysis now fully available

  • June

    • Arnold and Birss reversed, Swiss polyglots and Kozinski’s lecture – the week in IP

    • Sponsored statement: Prepare for post-AIA filings this fall

    • What’s holding back China’s movie industry?

    • The way forward for India’s IP system

    • Should Congress amend Section 101?

    • How to make open innovation work

    • Bio/pharma IPRs by the numbers

    • In-house patent counsel: we want your views on the UPC!

    • IP in Asia (1) – takeaways from London forum

    • SPCs demystified in our next webinar

    • Fitbit, Jawbone, Kyle Bass, PTAB, iWatch – the week in IP

    • Bass files 16th IPR petition as opposition continues to build

    • IPRs and Section 101 to take centre stage at BIO convention

    • PTAB moves squarely into US lawmakers’ sights in rewritten PATENT Act

    • Making sense of the UPC fee proposals

    • Sponsored post: June 11 New York event taps top creative minds to explore the secret to innovation

    • Is there life in Ultramercial yet?

    • Patent litigation, .sucks, Vice Media, TTAB, Blackberry, Typo – the week in IP

    • Anti-counterfeiting: handle with care

    • Confidential information and cybersecurity

    • Share your views on the Unitary Patent and UPC

    • Guest blog: China and the first-to-file exception

  • May

    • Ford, Google, Oracle, patent grants, Led Zeppelin, Supreme Court – the week in IP

    • Are more changes needed to IPR proceedings?

    • What are the IP industry disrupters?

    • Moving towards some FRAND and SEP answers

    • Guest blog: Will UPC lead to a rise in arbitration?

    • Rihanna, DC Comics, Lycos, Rockstar Games, Happy Birthday to You, Alibaba – the week in IP

    • Join us in London and Munich for the IP in Asia Forum

    • Turning a corner on the new gTLDs

    • Garcia v Google reversal warmly received (except by Judge Kozinski)

    • Grey market strategy wall map

    • Google, Oracle, Uber, Amazon, Twitter hashtags, stays pending IPR – the week in IP

    • Photos from our Women in IP Network drinks reception

    • Guest blog: How high will UPC fees be?

    • Free webinar: Avoiding pitfalls in PTAB post-grant trials during the Second Phase

    • Highlights from INTA’s biggest ever meeting

    • Unitary Patent: Stop talking, start planning

    • Special 301 report, Grooveshark, MPAA, Louis Vuitton, Eclipse IP – the week in IP

  • April

    • Download the new Managing IP app!

    • Should the EU courts have an IP tribunal?

    • Google’s patent purchase experiment leaves unanswered questions

    • Managing IP at the INTA Annual Meeting

    • Federal Circuit, Canada copyright, Katy Perry, Twitter, John Oliver – the week in IP

    • EU trade mark deal struck, so what happens now?

    • Patent reform, USPTO, Adidas, Marc Jacobs, .sucks, Federal Circuit – the week in IP

    • Two trade mark questions to be clarified in Europe

    • Free webinar: Avoiding the pitfalls in post-grant trials at the PTAB

    • Hedge fund IPRs, Apple Watch, Juno, Novartis, Google, USPTO – the week in IP

    • IP Finance conference will reveal how best to tap IP’s potential

    • Spotlight on Zynga

    • 101 opinions, Robin Williams, PTAB, Jay-Z, Perfect 10 – the week in IP

    • A focus on China

  • March

    • Guest post: ASIPI debates IP in agriculture

    • Twitter Q&A with Professor Hugh Hansen - the highlights

    • Panasonic, Taylor Swift, Motorola, Intellectual Ventures, AT&T – the week in IP

    • Guest blog: The lessons from France’s fight against online fakes

    • Takeaways from the US Patent Forum in Silicon Valley

    • Why the Commission is rattled over the Unitary Patent

    • Guest blog: The five principles of IP licensing

    • Twitter Q&A on March 25 with Professor Hugh Hansen

    • Free webinar: using data to reinvent IP management

    • International Patent Forum: Day 2 highlights

    • Blurred Lines, plain packaging, Hewlett-Packard, Kraftwerk, Disney – the week in IP

    • Global Awards Dinner 2015: your tweets and pictures

    • Guest post: How the Digital Single Market will affect brand owners

    • International Patent Forum: five highlights from day 1

    • US patent litigation makes a comeback in 2015

    • Apple, Samsung, Hall & Oates, USPTO, Under Armour, patent reform – the week in IP

    • Senator Coons throws “legislative grenade” at PTAB proceedings

    • How China is changing

  • February

    • Amazon, Bob Marley, Seattle Seahawks, Washington Redskins, Supreme Court, Blurred Lines – the week in IP

    • Blog readers promotion – last chance

    • Check out the recently-launched Managing IP US

    • Join the Managing IP readership!

    • Some proposed fixes to the US patent system, but is it even broken?

    • A trip to Beijing

    • Managing IP testimonial - Gordon Harris, Wragge Lawrence Graham

    • Managing IP testimonials – David Kappos (Cravath) and Francisco Bernardo (ABG Patentes)

    • Managing IP testimonials – Ted Chwu, Bird & Bird and Catherine Zheng, Deacons

    • Meet the Managing IP team: Emma Barraclough

    • Meet the Managing IP team: James Nurton

    • Meet the Managing IP team: Michael Loney

    • Meet the Managing IP team: Nick Heath

    • Meet the Managing IP team: Peter Leung

    • The US Patent Forum is coming soon to DC and Silicon Valley

    • Managing IP – a week of special offers

    • Managing IP’s first 25 years – a timeline

    • Unitary Patent and UPC – the story so far

    • Oscars, Tesla, BlackBerry, Typo, Myriad, Tumblr – the week in IP

    • Managing IP research timetable 2015

    • In-house counsel: take our Unitary Patent survey

    • Special awards to celebrate a decade of IP excellence

    • IBM, Priceline, Red Bull, Life360, Fox, Katy Perry – the week in IP

    • Join us for the fifth annual International Patent Forum

    • Latest IP updates from around the world

    • The petitioners, patent owners and law firms topping the PTAB rankings

    • Guest blog: Why Europe must reform its trade secrets rules

    • Has China’s “skin in the game moment” arrived?

    • Copyright Office, Katy Perry, Alice motions, in-house survey, TTAB – the week in IP

    • Concerns over Europeanisation of IP law

  • January

    • Alibaba's counterfeits spat may signal e-commerce shift

    • Bifurcation and the UPC – comments welcome!

    • Taylor Swift, patent reform, Hershey’s, Cadbury’s, Sam Smith, Tom Petty, stupid patent of the month – the week in IP

    • Meet the new model patent litigator

    • An insight into IP in Turkey

    • Ultramercial, Seattle Seahawks, Beastie Boys, US Supreme Court, Copyright Week, USPTO’s Michelle Lee – the week in IP

    • Why IP needs events aimed at women

    • Je Suis Charlie, Samsung, Blackberry, Apple, GoPro, India, gTLDs – the week in IP

    • Protecting nation brands and country names

    • Google enters top 10 in US patent recipient rankings

    • Toyota, China, Intellectual Ventures, Google, Apple, Coca-Cola – the week in IP

    • Guest post: ASIPI’s anniversary marked in style

    • Now is the time to prepare for the Unitary Patent and UPC

    • Unhappy new year for the US patent market?

• 2014

  • December

    • IP highlights of 2014 - on Twitter

    • The year in damages in the US

    • Garcia v Google, Verizon, Uber, Eat More Kale, Federal Circuit – the week in IP

    • Work in London and want to enhance your IP library?

    • How goes the trade mark filing race?

    • The IP highlights of 2014

    • The wait for the new USPTO 101 guidance is over

    • SCOTUS sanction threat, Comfyballs, Jay-Z, Google News, Pirate Bay, monkey selfie – the week in IP

    • Don’t miss our webinar on IP strategy

    • SCOTUS takes new patent case, Cisco sues Arista, pushback on reform, Canadian applications fall – the week in IP

    • Business method patent issuance has plummeted since Alice

    • Don't miss our US IP events next week

  • November

    • Guest post: Has UK copyright reform gone far enough?

    • Progress on UPC Rules highlights inertia on fees

    • Time for US companies to get to know the UPC

    • Teleworking, Apple, Aereo, Canadian trade marks, patent reform latest – the week in IP

    • The reasons for the drop in US patent litigation

    • Latest developments in IP in Mexico

    • Happy 20th birthday to OHIM

    • IPR appeal hearing, Facebook, MPHJ, Eiffel Tower, Federal Circuit – the week in IP

    • Guest blog: Why EU lawmakers must balance trade mark rights with fundamental freedoms

    • Did the APEC summit lay the groundwork for future IP developments?

    • Fordham symposium to discuss USPTO, trade mark and copyright

    • The number one issue for IP owners

    • What has been agreed on Patent Box reforms?

    • Country updates in our November issue

    • Pending patent cases, Sherlock Holmes, Kim Kardashian, LG, Google – the week in IP

    • Patent reform is more likely, but less needed

    • Play Interflora Snakes & Ladders

    • Avoid the antitrust trap in Asia

    • Online now – IP Clinic on hashtag rights

    • Fast-track patents, Lucasfilm, Manuel Noriega, Activision, Marvin Gaye, Zorro – the week in IP

  • October

    • Highlights from the AIPLA annual meeting

    • Shout if you want a grace period

    • Copyright reform: it’s not about what or how, but who

    • Alice, Converse, patent reform, Donuts, Rod Stewart – the week in IP

    • The value of an open source dividend

    • Managing IP Survey 2015 FAQ

    • Two pharma patent questions that warrant further discussion

    • Is Weatherley's world too black and white?

    • Apple, Nobel Prize, Kim Dotcom, Bose, Beats, Chobani, Rader bobbleheads – the week in IP

    • Time to rethink the limits to trade mark rights?

    • Are utility models a key part of India’s economic strategy?

    • Is Alice deterring US patent case filings?

    • Who will be the UPC winners and losers?

    • Are patent boxes more than an IP-shifting exercise?

    • The worldwide problem of commercialisation

    • Grooveshark, Michelle Lee, USPTO, Marvel, Boston Scientific – the week in IP

    • Do your business colleagues understand trade marks?

    • UPC questions centre on judges and costs – video interviews

  • September

    • Highlights from Twitter Q&A with the UK IPO’s Rosa Wilkinson

    • Guest post: Catriona Hammer on the CIPA Congress

    • Sirius, ukulele feud, YODA bill, Monster Energy, most-cited IP articles, Ecuador’s licences – the week in IP

    • MARQUES Conference Day 2 report

    • PTAB proceedings – the most stay-friendly district courts

    • Five notes from MARQUES Day 1

    • Is Alibaba China’s biggest brand?

    • Google, Jay-Z, McDonald’s, Blurred Lines, Innocence of Muslims, House of Cards – the week in IP

    • Join the debate about IP and innovation in our first Twitter Q&A

    • Is the B word now less of a curse?

    • Guest blog: Gwilym Roberts on the IPO’s mission to China

    • The Alice effect, USPTO defended, Led Zeppelin copyright dispute, Microsoft-Samsung latest – the week in IP

    • Can the Indian government jump-start its innovation-driven industries?

    • Disney, Deadmau5, nude photo leak, Twitpic, Twitter, Getty, Microsoft, Ultramercial, Personal Audio – the week in IP

    • Advice on early resolution of IP disputes

    • How much of a job creator is IP?

  • August

    • ALS Association, Oracle, plain packaging, Deep Throat, Google, Illinois patent troll bill – this week’s round-up

    • The biggest PTAB milestones so far. Is a rule tweak next?

    • Five IP trends we’ll be tracking this year

    • Edinburgh Fringe, Fast & Furious 6, Irish referendum, IP Week – this week’s round-up

    • Guest post: The lessons from Apple and Samsung's smartphone stalemate

    • Where do you stand on plain packaging?

    • Premier League, Vringo, Google, USPTO, Washington Redskins, North Carolina troll bill – the week in IP

    • Trade secrets get sexy

    • What do in-house counsel think about the Unitary Patent & UPC?

    • Monkey selfie, CETA, Jay-Z, Tesla, Arthur Conan Doyle estate – the week in IP

    • Guest post by Baroness Neville-Rolfe: The lure of intellectual property

    • GlaxoSmithKline's China bribery case may have serious consequences for IP enforcement

    • Ronaldo, Bose, Beats, Skywalker, Greek yoghurt, USPTO, South Africa – the week in IP

  • July

    • The overstated effect of patent trolls on litigation

    • What’s in the July-August issue of Managing IP

    • How would you streamline your IP system?

    • Guest blog: Patents in the biopesticide industry revealed

    • A tale of sports stars, rappers and lawyers

    • FedEx, LVMH/eBay, TM surveys, universities and Chubby Checker – the week in IP

    • Guest blog: Brüstle debunked

    • Guest blog: Real life lessons in open innovation and IP

    • Not so influential now - UK replaces IP minister

    • Seth MacFarlane, Eli Lilly, Sherlock Holmes, Aereo, IP spending – the week in IP

    • What is innovation and how do you measure it?

    • Guest post: The Supreme Court shows unprecedented interest in IP issues

    • What role do governments play in innovation?

    • Aereo, USPTO, Thomas Pink, Victoria’s Secret, Tesla, TPP – the week in IP

    • The sweet smell of success - or failure

    • Rader’s good-bye, Microsoft and Canon deal, Lindsay Lohan lawsuit, BP denied – the week in IP

  • June

    • Can intellectual property ever be non-political?

    • Aereo, Marvel, .wine, Jones Day, Pitbull, damages report – the week in IP

    • Reactions to US Supreme Court ruling 6-3 against Aereo

    • In the debate about IP enforcement, words matter

    • Alice v CLS reaction from around the internet

    • Half of the human race

    • Sherlock Holmes, Redskins, IKEA, Philip Morris, Smokey Robinson – the week in IP

    • iFone win, Lego image dispute, Hitler copyright controversy, new patent troll study – the week in IP

    • IP Summit needs to reach out beyond Westminster

    • Football World Cup quiz

    • Outstanding achievement award – Tian Lipu, former commissioner of SIPO

    • Who are the most influential people in IP this year?

    • Beastie Boys’ copyright win, Hatch calls for USPTO director, Hershey’s sues pot co-op, dispute over “Mormon”, Harper Lee kills lawsuit – the week in IP

    • Are TPP supporters talking to themselves?

    • Things are not as bad as they seem at the Federal Circuit

    • Mediation – the question no one dares to ask

  • May

    • Spherix shares rise then fall, .club takes number one gTLD slot, Apple requests retrial, Marines go on trade mark offensive – the week in IP

    • The bottom line benefits of gender diversity

    • Learn to optimise your IP supply chain

    • Looking forward to the International IP Enforcement Summit, London, June 11-12

    • Amazon loses domain bid, Medtronic settles with Edwards Lifesciences, Nintendo scores patent victory, Led Zeppelin in copyright fight - the week in IP

    • Are big changes coming in India?

    • How to develop a talent pipeline

    • Apple and Google drop litigation, top US copyright suit filer revealed, Samsung/Rockstar dispute continues – the week in IP

    • The internet can be a ridiculous place

    • Time to widen the debate

    • US patent litigation up 12.4%, with trolls the top 10 plaintiffs

    • What’s different about INTA this year?

    • Did SCOTUS clear the way for patent reform? Don’t hold your breath

    • Is the next big Chinese brand coming?

    • Fifth US patent reform delay, Alibaba’s pre-IPO patent spree, UK Patent Box attracts Pfizer, MPHJ Vermont setback, at home with Kim Dotcom – the week in IP

    • Why brands will win from new gTLDs

  • April

    • World IP Day movie quiz: the answers

    • Learn, network and share best practices at the 2014 Women’s Leadership Forum

    • Patent lawsuit spike, Maltesers dispute, Google/Foxconn patent deal, Pfizer’s India criticism – the week in IP

    • Fordham IP Conference 2014: Day 1 highlights

    • Guest post: An open letter to Abraham Lincoln from David Kappos

    • IP courts: the next step in China’s IP evolution?

    • Download your copy of our Europe IP Focus

    • World IP Day 2014 quiz

    • World IP Day interview part 1: WIPO Director General Francis Gurry

    • Score sheet: Aereo and FilmOn X versus the broadcasters

    • Canada IP criticism, Megaupload lawsuits, Tennessee troll reform, Scotch trade mark, Jay-Z ruling – the week in IP

    • The people from the IPO want to help you

    • What 52% tells us about the Unitary Patent discussions

    • Apple opts out of new IV fund, four governments protest .wine, USPTO has record week, Google fights to get Glass trade mark – the week in IP

    • Guest post: What would Scottish independence mean for patents?

    • In defence of the USPTO’s Myriad guidelines

    • Trade mark publication trends: Boom and BUSTT

    • From FRAND to the IP crisis, Fordham hits the hot topics

    • Keeping up with China

    • SCOTUS takes another patent case, Marvell verdict increased, UK progressing on plain packaging, Lenovo buys NEC patents – the week in IP

    • India, UPC and copyright rankings: latest issue of Managing IP

  • March

    • Microsoft/Dell licensing deal, Leahy bill hearing delayed, USPTO issues 700,000th design patent – the week in IP

    • The ideal IP Office

    • Managing IP North America Awards 2014: the winners

    • The limits of US states’ action against patent trolls

    • New Zealand and Australia: Bypassing the PPH

    • State AGs call for fee shifting, EC rule change to “dismay licensors”, Beastie Boys settle with GoldieBlox, Google ordered to pay $85 million – the week in IP

    • Managing IP Global Awards 2014: the winners

    • Google demands Garcia rehearing, Pfizer patent invalidated, EU kicks up stink over cheese, US patent litigation plummets - the week in IP

    • DeGeneres “selfie” is a golden opportunity to improve IP education

    • Michelle Lee to open Managing IP's US Patent Forum on March 25

    • Oscars selfie debate, top patent troll targets, Batmobile copyright fight – the week in IP

    • Less than two weeks until International Patent Forum 2014

    • Why Europe needs more reliable IP valuations

    • What would the ideal patent system look like?

  • February

    • Are debates on the role of IP in disseminating green technology about to heat up again?

    • Revealed: university patent transaction trends 2013

    • Senate troll bill introduced, Betty Boop back in court, $2bn lawsuit against Apple rejected– the week in IP

    • Why everyone's talking about Finnegan

    • Failure in Apple/Samsung talks shows limits of mediation

    • Should judges promote settlement?

    • USPTO’s “staggering incompetence”, NSA parody settlement, Nicki Minaj wig dispute – the week in IP

    • Will brands flock to non-Latin alphabet gTLDs?

    • Apple/Samsung mediation fails, EU rules on unregistered design rights, IV cuts staff by 5% – the week in IP

    • Commercial suicide or good business sense?

    • IP in India: beyond the headlines

    • “Dumb Starbucks” - dumb fair use defence

    • When social media can be a brand owner's friend

    • How to improve trade mark registration procedures

    • Why hasn’t the US brought its TRIPS case against India?

    • Do you need an international firm in China?

    • IV and Google mistrial, Cisco/IBM patent licensing deal, Red Bull locks horns over trade mark - the week in IP

    • Time for a rethink: why the pharmaceutical R&D system needs to change

    • How to be a successful IP firm

    • USPTO’s Michelle Lee comes bearing good news, leaves mixed response

    • What’s behind the UK trade mark litigation boom?

  • January

    • Prince, Google, Victoria’s Secret, boxing and flexing your muscles – the week in IP

    • Is the US IP system really the world’s best?

    • The sad status of trade mark surveys

    • The week in IP - Qualcomm buys HP patents, Candy trade mark leaves bad taste, Rockstar drops suit against Huawei

    • Do plain packs actually help counterfeiters?

    • Was the InterDigital arrest controversy just a misunderstanding?

    • The week in IP – Record EPO applications, Cronut gets trade mark, Marvin Gaye’s estate in Blurred Lines settlement

    • 2014 looking like a bad year to be a patent troll

    • SCOTUS justices must step up on software patents

    • Qualcomm, Apple and Google soar up patent assignee rankings

    • A big day at the Supreme Court for patent case watchers

    • The week in IP - Coinye West, USPTO rejects R-word, Samsung and Apple CEOs to discuss patent dispute

    • Where does the Inventor Trail end?

    • Is SIPO taking a different tack?

    • 2013: how was it for you?

    • FRAND looms large in the Year of the Horse

• 2013

  • December

    • Free content in our latest issue

    • Lee's USPTO appointment causes a stir

    • Don’t miss our webinar on trolls and damages

    • Who gains from the relentless rise in IP applications?

    • Rockstar gives us a lesson in accounting

    • Guest post: Is a Duck Dynasty IP shoot-out brewing?

    • What is a good measure of IP progress?

    • The patent party won’t last forever

    • Charbucks proves that context is everything in trade mark dilution claims

    • IP litigation is a big deal in Asia

    • WTO meeting in Bali shows how IP has turned bilateral

  • November

    • What are IP journalists doing wrong?

    • USPTO now a “crisis situation” after Rea leaves

    • The pace of patent litigation reform is speeding up

    • Branding and innovation - strange bedfellows

    • Superman and The King live on; five around the web

    • Brand owners are still not ready for gTLDs. Why?

    • How China is bucking the trend on R&D spending

    • Do IP practitioners have a sense of humour?

    • Trade mark attorneys coming to the High Court

    • Five FRAND questions - but what are the answers?

    • The TPP and the ghosts of treaties past

    • Guest post: Branding for development

    • The IP world is getting smaller

    • Will trade deals stymie IP progress?

    • Is the reputation of London's IP rulings under threat?

    • Sponsored statement: Choosing a Patent Litigation Venue

    • India rejects another compulsory licence

  • October

    • Concerns raised over litigation speed in Brazil

    • How can the Federal Circuit resolve its “failure” to define Section 101?

    • The importance of getting unitary patent fees right

    • Who’s really shaping the troll debate?

    • Speakers confirmed for webinar on Brazil

    • Europe’s new sport: fighting to host UPC divisions

    • Guest blog: Why the UK warrants more local divisions in the UPC

    • Munich, the EPC, and the wider world

    • Webinars on Myanmar and Brazil

    • Text me maybe: the new sales channels used by counterfeiters

    • The UK’s IP Tsar must do more than represent IP owners

    • Do we even need IP marketplaces?

    • Guest blog: OHIM’s chief economist on the role of IP in Europe’s economy

    • Why attorney fees may not be the key to reducing patent trolling

    • Who wants to be an IP leader?

    • AIPLA President's blog: A year in IP

    • Questions about the European IP value report

  • September

    • The B word provokes UPC angst in Munich

    • Hong Kong pushes forward with IP hub strategy

    • Managing IP annual survey research

    • Five-minute guide to day two of MARQUES

    • MARQUES in Monte Carlo: a five-minute update

    • Sponsored statement: Full Text of Asian Patents in English

    • Weekly roundup: music-and-IP edition

    • The further adventures of Alice

    • Cops to crack down on IP crime

    • What’s on this week

    • Injunctions under review in China

    • To fight trolls, do we need more than good patents?

    • Good advice on a career in IP

    • Mixed fortunes for pharma in China

  • August

    • Dreams, trolls and investigators – weekly web round-up

    • Patent trolls and barking dogs

    • Performers provide two perspectives on copyright

    • AIPLA President’s blog: Privilege in Paris

    • IP disputes in focus as TPP talks resume

    • The new PatentOptimizer™ Patent Thesaurus

    • Storm in a tankard

    • BlackBerry and the patent trolls

    • Topshop, ear printing, Nigerian music and IP heroes – weekly web round up

    • What's the difference between public interest and protectionism?

    • From EPC to UPC in 40 years

    • Who needs image rights when you have passing off?

    • Weekly web round-up: US IP investment, Customs team-up and the joys of radio station ownership

    • Five trends in US patent litigation

    • Parallel imports – good for printers, bad for medicine?

  • July

    • Lords debate UK IP Bill today

    • How to build an IP marketplace

    • Think big when assessing IP influence

    • Most influential people in IP: who’s missing?

    • The truth about lookalikes

    • New internet, old trade mark lessons

    • "Indefinite" hold on new USPTO offices is unlikely to last long

    • China’s IP reforms are picking up steam

    • Twitter, a Royal baby and the parody exception

    • What new revenue sources do you see?

    • The patent box backlash begins

    • Final countdown in copyright exception battle

    • Supreme Court judges take the long view

    • IP funding gets creative

  • June

    • Would you risk settling a pharma patent case today?

    • EU trade mark proposals sound wrong, in any language

    • Introducing Managing IP 3.0

    • Will we see globe-trotting patent trolls any time soon?

    • The trade marks that are famous but nameless

    • Chinese IP owners are not always what you expect

    • Word from our sponsor: Stake your claim: LexisNexis® IP Portfolio

    • Expert evidence divergence raises questions for UPC

    • AIPLA President’s blog: When sequestration hits the genetic fan …

    • How nine judges could eclipse Obama

    • Intellectual property and political rights

    • What next for the Madrid Protocol?

    • Defeating trolls requires tackling patent inflation

    • AIPLA President’s blog: A lack of judicial guidance

  • May

    • Guest post: Is the first-inventor-to-file system constitutional?

    • Intellectual property with Chinese characteristics

    • Wanted: electrical engineers

    • Yahoo acquisition of Tumblr creates copyright concerns

    • AIPLA President’s blog: Angelina Jolie, breast cancer and Myriad

    • Unitary patent figures don’t add up

    • AIPLA President’s blog: Women and IP in Japan

    • Does Africa need more lawyers?

    • How would you improve the Madrid System?

    • Patent pools under pressure

    • Should there be criminal penalties for design infringement?

    • How long do patents last? The debate continues

    • The mystery of China

  • April

    • AIPLA President’s blog: Promoting diversity in IP

    • Three challenges for new INTA chief executive

    • Dualit case is a warning to UK litigators

    • Adjusting patent term is not the answer

    • Unitary patent: we need to see some numbers

    • Why Aereo encourages the wrong kind of innovation

    • Jeremy Phillips wins outstanding achievement award

    • Find out more about opportunities in China

    • Video interview: Judge Paul Michel on USPTO and Congress - part 2

    • Where is Asia’s IP hub?

    • Design infringement: the case for juries

    • Watch your language, warns Rakoff

    • Which firm will become the biggest for PCC work?

    • Big pharma faces an incendiary mix of distrust and austerity

    • Video interview: Paul Michel on the Shield Act, AIA and US Supreme Court

    • Goods-in-transit: be careful what you wish for

    • Will the Glivec decision slow innovation?

  • March

    • China’s innovation plans – and other news

    • Floyd and Vos promoted to Court of Appeal

    • How can you keep up with changes in China?

    • Beyond Pallante’s copyright testimony

    • Economists and IP owners should not be at war

    • Clearing houses, Indian smartphones and football copyright

    • AIPLA President’s blog: Keeping secrets, well, secret

    • Crestor, Google AdWords, Twitter patent and EU Action Plan

    • Intellectual Discovery, non-racist trade marks, Huawei vs ZTE, and costly Aussie medicines

    • Five tales from the North America Awards

    • Copyright law overhaul; first-to-file latest; and what are patents good for?

    • The Times, Cyprus, Apple suit, gTLD dispute and TMclass

    • On virtual disasters and consumer expectations

    • Trolls, JPO comments, EQE, movie piracy and looking ahead to INTA

    • Pope Francis, 3DS video, Indian patents, human rights v copyright and Schütz v Werit

    • Rader joins US Patent Forum

    • Should you fear supreme courts?

    • EPO, AIPLA, 3D piracy and twitter settlement

    • Bud, top patent cases, Redskins, copyright in the Lords and MARQUES

    • New trade mark rankings show moves and (de)mergers

    • AIPLA President’s blog: The Supreme Biotech

    • Megaupload, UAE rebate, seed controversy, trade mark liability and Sherlock Holmes

    • Complusory licence requests, Samsung's appeal, online reputations and the UK's plain packaging plans

    • CJEU figures; patent box; USPTO Denver; foreign IP and India forum

    • EPO trends, TRIPs, iPhone cases, Twitter’s patents and the TPP

    • The paradox in US patent filing

    • AIPLA President’s blog: Why can't we all get along?

    • Cell phones, arbitration, patent damages, German cake and Medellín

    • The examiners examined

    • Apple damages, patent box surge and Chinese IP wars

    • Dow's tax affairs, WW2 reparations and cases against Icann

  • February

    • AIPLA President’s blog: When the generic settlement pays

    • AIPLA President’s blog: When the generic settlement pays

    • Jesus jeans, Dilbert, Crocs, SHIELD and Game of Thrones

    • 5-a-day: music downloads, a taste of tobacco and the Bolar exemption

    • 5-a-day: USPTO lessons, six strikes and new gTLD progress

    • What the awards shortlists tell us about IP practice

    • 5-a-day: Microsoft on patents, Oscar statues and CTM reforms

    • The utility of utility models

    • 5-a-day: Cyber attacks, 3D printing and Batman v Batsman

    • 5-a-day: The Harlem Shake, cab drivers fight fakes and Tolkien controversy

    • 5-a-day: Monsanto's patent; China's resale right plans; and WIPO negotiations

    • 5-a-day: Religious trade marks, Bowman v Monsanto and brand rankings

    • How to make the unitary patent and UPC succeed

    • 5-a-day: Copyright in China, Apple store trade marked and patents in Pakistan

    • Pressure builds for US software patent reform

    • 5-a-day: Fake fashion, Raising the Bar and Chubby Checker

    • 5-a-day: thought leaders, software patents and Obama

    • How do you solve the second medical use problem?

    • 5-a-day: PCT, WIPO on YouTube, Tetris and Facebook Like

    • 5-a-day: CTM changes; CLS v Alice and the return of Kim Dotcom

  • January

    • AIPLA President’s blog: FICPI, ACPC and ABA meetings

    • AIPLA President's blog: A submarine attack on submarines

    • AIPLA President's blog: Cuba...a world away

    • AIPLA President's blog: Uruguay, vegetable mistakes and the Paris Convention

• 2012

  • November

    • Havana Nocturne: greetings from Cuba… and Uruguay

    • Amicus briefs and AIPLA: an inside look

    • Reflections on a path to the Presidency

    • From the AIPLA President

  • October

    • What will attract rights holders to IP marketplaces?

  • June

    • Word from our sponsor: Stake your claim: LexisNexis® IP Portfolio

  • January

    • Guest blog: Why the UK warrants more local divisions in the UPC

    • Utynam's Heirs

IP-related blogs

1709 Copyright Blog

Afro-IP

AIA blog

Art and Artifice

China IPR

Class 99

Domain Incite

FOSS Patents

Green Patent Blog

Incontestable

IP CloseUp

IP Dragon

IP finance

IP Kat

IP Komodo

IP tango

IP Watchdog

IPEG

MARQUES Class 46

Orange Book Blog

Patent Baristas

PatentlyO

PatLit

SPC Blog

Spicy IP

The Trademark Blog

The TTABlog