InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

The sweet smell of success - or failure



James Nurton


There’s an interesting discussion going on over on our LinkedIn page about IP protection for fragrances

Kamiya ShamsThe discussion was kicked off by Kimiya Shams (pictured), who has written an op-ed for businessoffashion.com titled " On Why Fragrances Should Qualify for IP Protection".

Kimiya reviews recent case law, including last year’s French Supreme Court case Lancôme v Modefine ruling out copyright protection; the Dutch case Lancôme v Kecofa which on the contrary found there was copyright in perfumes; and the long-running L’Oréal v Bellure smell-a-like trade mark case in the UK and CJEU (see picture, below left).

Kimiya concludes: "Innovation has been the key factor to the development of the fragrances we see today, but now it’s at risk of abuse. To deny the sector IP protection would cause losses, not only for the fragrance industry, but also for nations who benefit from being at the forefront of innovation, but cannot compete on cost alone."

Bellure Pink WonderVarious views have been expressed on the discussion board. Erica Bristol points out that scents are registrable as trade marks in the US, While Kamiya herself notes that proposed changes to EU trade mark law (the replacement of the "graphical representation" requirement) could make it easier to protect smells in Europe.

Meanwhile, Robert Welsh argues that "fragrances fall in between the conventional forms of IP protection". In particular, he says, "patents would reveal too much" making it easy to reverse-engineer compositions. In another comment, Andrew Bridges questions whether additional IP protection is needed given the success of the industry up until now. This is a point echoed by Brian Hubbard, who asks: "How is the current IP situation for fragrance houses any different from that faced by great chefs for their food?"

It’s an interesting debate, and we would welcome further contributions. Personally, I think it’s unlikely that there would be sufficient demand to create a new IP right for fragrances, let alone one that could be adopted around the world (what would we call it anyway? Topography of integrated tinctures?).

That leaves copyright, trade marks and patents. The copyright objections made by the French courts seem to make sense (though it has been criticised for adding a new requirement for protection), and scent trade marks don’t seem to have appealed to applicants so far (plus there would be objections based on the potential for indefinite protection).

Despite the concerns, therefore, you could argue that patents are the most appropriate form of protection if there is genuine innovation in perfumes (or in the way they are manufactured) – provided of course that the fragrance meets the usual patentability criteria in the relevant market. Yes, that only covers you for 20 years but that should be long enough for many products, and in any case long enough to provide a return on the investment in research. Patents exist in principle to promote innovation, and they’re good enough for many other industries – so why not fragrances too?

Comments






Article Comments

Protecting fragrances with patente seems quite difficult considering the typical European problem/solution approach for determining if there is or not an inventive step. when is a differentiating feature of a fragrance obvious and what shoul be the specific technical problem solved by the differentiating feature (for example a component of a blend). Furthermore there is also a problem relating the documentation of the prior art up today.
One solution could be using the graphical output of a electronic nose or of a gaschromatographie or of a mass spectrometer or a combination thereof and registering the results as graphic representations of a trademark or of a design. this way could help to overcome the limitations to a graphic representation of subject matter that can be protected by trademark or desogns and give also a goog instrument to carry out comparisons between fragrances

Giorgio Alessandro Karaghiosoff Jul 10, 2014

profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

RT @Alexjdwilson: Proposed UK/EU Brussels jurisdiction Reg for commercial disputes: EPs (and UPC, Bundesverfassungsgericht willing) https:…

Aug 22 2017 09:16 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

RT @MarquesIP: Flexible LCD watch bands: Nike battle a lone designer. David Musker reports on Class 99 https://t.co/f6PT2OpOgO

Aug 22 2017 09:16 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

How do lawyers & business react to Pres. Trump's @ustraderep inquiry into "IP theft" in China? By Karry Lai @asialaw https://t.co/k0AygDCVxX

Aug 22 2017 08:56 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

IP-related blogs

1709 Copyright Blog

Afro-IP

AIA blog

Art and Artifice

China IPR

Class 99

Domain Incite

FOSS Patents

Green Patent Blog

Incontestable

IP CloseUp

IP Dragon

IP finance

IP Kat

IP Komodo

IP tango

IP Watchdog

IPEG

MARQUES Class 46

Orange Book Blog

Patent Baristas

PatentlyO

PatLit

SPC Blog

Spicy IP

The Trademark Blog

The TTABlog