InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

Are debates on the role of IP in disseminating green technology about to heat up again?



Emma Barraclough


The green technology issue was back on the agenda at this week’s meeting of the TRIPs Council in Geneva, when Ecuador suggested it could update its year-old proposal on easing patent terms and strengthening TRIPs flexibilities for environmentally sound technologies.

This was partly because the proposal related to the December 2013 Bali Ministerial Conference, with a call for a declaration highlighting the flexibilities available in the TRIPs Agreement (along the lines of the 2001 Doha Ministerial Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health). The delegate from Ecuador also proposed reducing patent terms for green technologies.

Sources at the WTO say that Ecuador won support from Cuba, El Salvador, India, China, South Africa, Brazil and Benin. Unsurprisingly IP-rich members (the EU, Japan, Switzerland, the US and Australia, along with Chile) argued that IP protection does not obstruct technology transfer. Factors such as regulatory regimes, proper infrastructure and low patent fees are also important for technology transfer.

There are plenty of practical problems raised by issues to do green technology, not least agreeing what it is. Does an innovation that allows coal-fired power stations to produce 5% less CO2 than a conventional power station, for example, constitute environmentally-sound technology?

But working out some answers to those kinds of questions, and gathering some data that demonstrates the role (positive or negative) of IP in the transfer of climate change-mitigating technology should surely be near the top of policy makers’ to-do lists.

When Ecuador first submitted its proposal last year, Saudi Arabia said that climate change should be discussed in organisations such as the UN Environment Programme, and by the WTO’s Trade and Environment Committee, but not the TRIPs Council. That kind of forum shifting has served to prevent much meaningful progress on issues to do with IP and traditional knowledge. Surely climate change is too important an issue for TRIPs Council members to bat off elsewhere?

Comments






profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

ICYMI: Our report on this week's #SCOTUS ruling in Star Athletica v Varsity Brands https://t.co/Rf3TWplNUrhttps://t.co/TrZ5YcvKQr

Mar 24 2017 01:35 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

@Oblon_IP @PatentPostGrant Congratulations Scott! #mipawards

Mar 24 2017 01:13 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

@KellyIPllp Well done to all at the firm!

Mar 24 2017 02:16 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

IP-related blogs

1709 Copyright Blog

Afro-IP

AIA blog

Art and Artifice

China IPR

Class 99

Domain Incite

FOSS Patents

Green Patent Blog

Incontestable

IP CloseUp

IP Dragon

IP finance

IP Kat

IP Komodo

IP tango

IP Watchdog

IPEG

MARQUES Class 46

Orange Book Blog

Patent Baristas

PatentlyO

PatLit

SPC Blog

Spicy IP

The Trademark Blog

The TTABlog