InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

Supreme Court judges take the long view



James Nurton


Drop your legal text books, case reports and academic journals; for insight into how UK Supreme Court judges think, brush up on medieval history

UK Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court (right) published its judgment in the Virgin Atlantic v Zodiac case this week, its fifth IP ruling since it replaced the House of Lords as the UK’s highest court in October 2009, following Lucasfilm v Ainsworth (copyright and design), HGS v Eli Lilly, Schutz v Werit (both patent) and PRCA v NLA (copyright). As we’ve noted before, the generalist judges of the Supreme Court seem to take a somewhat different view to the specialists in the Court of Appeal: in four of these cases they have reversed the lower court, and in the other one (PRCA) they referred questions to the CJEU.

It prompts the question: what makes them tick? Contrary to what you might expect, today’s Supreme Court judges don’t wear robes; they consult laptops during trials; and even have their own TV channel. Interestingly, the lead opinions in the two most recent IP judgments were both written by Lord Sumption, the very model of a modern judge.

Lord SumptionSumption (left) was appointed to the Court without having served an apprenticeship in the High Court or Court of Appeal. He was viewed as one of London’s best barristers (a member of Brick Court Chambers, home to that other notable IP jurist Lord Hoffmann) and his last job before joining the bench was successfully representing the Russian billionaire and Chelsea FC owner Roman Abramovich in a $6.5 billion trial over oil and gas deals in Russia (Sumption was rumoured to have been paid some £10 million in fees – though this figure seems too high to be credible, even by the standards of the London bar).

Before becoming a lawyer Sumption was a professional historian at Oxford University and he is probably as well known for his prize-winning history of the Hundred Years War as for his legal work. He has published three big volumes so far, and has a further two planned. For those not familiar with this saga of English-French rivalry (which, some would argue, continues in debates in Brussels today), the Hundred Years War was a dynastic and territorial dispute that lasted from 1337 to 1453. It’s probably most familiar today through the filter of Shakespeare, in particular the play Henry V.

Stormtrooper helmet
One of Lord Sumption's former clients

Sumption is learned, cultured, successful and, according to those who have seen him in action, "spectacularly bright" and "able to see straight through flannel". Apart from being an author, he has no background in IP (though he was called in to represent Lucasfilm before the Supreme Court in the Star Wars helmet case) and no scientific training. But working on billion-dollar cases and having a detailed knowledge of medieval European history probably gives you a sense of perspective. For Sumption, reviewing a patent decision from 1908 – as he did in the Zodiac case – must have felt like reading a newspaper.

And does all that help you come to the right decision? In Zodiac, the Court effectively overturned existing practice, saying that damages should not have to be paid for infringing a patent that has been revoked. On one hand, you could say that sounds reasonable: patent owners should not be rewarded when there is no invention. On the other, does it make the outcome of litigation less certain and encourage time-wasting by parties? Readers will have their own views. But it’s probably not surprising, given its wide mandate and the varied experiences of its members, that for the Supreme Court the principle of fairness trumps all other considerations.

Comments






profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

RT @uspto: Join #USPTOSV on Aug. 2 for #trademark basics & what every #SmallBiz should know now, not later. Register: https://t.co/4dTuXW0O

Jul 26 2017 04:04 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

RT @CIGIonline: What renegotiating #NAFTA #IP rules could mean for Canada’s winemakers, sculptors, authors & musicians: https://t.co/7xuoxk

Jul 26 2017 03:21 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

RT @T_Hackett: #MarrakeshTreaty soon enters into force in two @EIFLnet partner countries: #Kyrgyzstan on 15 August and #Kenya on 2 Sept. Lo…

Jul 26 2017 02:45 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

IP-related blogs

1709 Copyright Blog

Afro-IP

AIA blog

Art and Artifice

China IPR

Class 99

Domain Incite

FOSS Patents

Green Patent Blog

Incontestable

IP CloseUp

IP Dragon

IP finance

IP Kat

IP Komodo

IP tango

IP Watchdog

IPEG

MARQUES Class 46

Orange Book Blog

Patent Baristas

PatentlyO

PatLit

SPC Blog

Spicy IP

The Trademark Blog

The TTABlog