InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

Watch your language, warns Rakoff



James Nurton


One of the highlights of last week’s Fordham IP Conference was the lunchtime speech from US District Judge Jed S Rakoff

Rakoff (right), who has senior status in the Southern District of New York, is one of the judges in the patent pilot programme, which 14 district courts are taking part in.

Judge RakoffIn a short and witty speech, Rakoff’s message to patent litigators was clear: too many of you do not use clear English words in litigation, or use them confusingly. This is particularly a problem in jury trials, but also affects judges and other parties in court.

As examples, he pointed to the use of terms such as 'reads on’ ("Even patent lawyers don’t use this term consistently!") and 'teach away’. Further barbs were aimed at 'prosecution history’ and 'file wrapper’.

"What is added by these obscure terms?" asked Rakoff, pointing out that they were "gibberish" to jurors. What’s worse, he added, is that in many cases these are not technical terms but everyday English words that sound ordinary, but are being invested with meanings beyond their normal use.

Rakoff’s advice ("simplify without being simplistic") reminded me of George Orwell’s classic essay Politics and the English Language, published in 1946 (and conveniently available royalty-free). Orwell’s target was politicians rather than lawyers, but I would suggest his advice (such as "If you simplify your English, you are freed from the worst follies of orthodoxy") is still valid today. Patent lawyers would be well advised to read his six tips on good writing or, if they have done so already, re-read them.

Fordham IP ConferenceLitigators might respond that they are dealt a poor hand by patent drafters who – unencumbered by the discipline of court time and judicial interruptions – are guilty of inflicting some horrible crimes on clear English. No doubt. They might also argue that they are dealing with legal, technical subjects that are inherently complex. All the more reason, I say, to express yourself as clearly as possible.

The use of certain technical terms of course is a kind of shorthand, understood and repeated by patent professionals in industry, private practice and the PTO. But I understood Rakoff to argue that even if that is acceptable in those narrow communities, it should be avoided where non-specialists are concerned. That’s true in the courtroom. As we face more debates over the protection and enforcement of IP rights, it’s also imperative for wider public discussion.

Comments






profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

Our editor James Nurton will be attending the @MarquesIP conference in Prague #marques17 from tomorrow. Say hi if y… https://t.co/FRjH4VdKuk

Sep 18 2017 02:52 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

New online: How do US, UK and EPO tribunals compare in patent infringement disputes? By Ilya Kazi of @Mathys_Squire… https://t.co/IxmyhKpGHI

Sep 18 2017 01:34 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

#ipwomen member Lara Kayode has written a paper on 5 common questions about IP protection in Africa (KE, NG & ZA) https://t.co/GqpObS9lk6

Sep 18 2017 10:20 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

IP-related blogs

1709 Copyright Blog

Afro-IP

AIA blog

Art and Artifice

China IPR

Class 99

Domain Incite

FOSS Patents

Green Patent Blog

Incontestable

IP CloseUp

IP Dragon

IP finance

IP Kat

IP Komodo

IP tango

IP Watchdog

IPEG

MARQUES Class 46

Orange Book Blog

Patent Baristas

PatentlyO

PatLit

SPC Blog

Spicy IP

The Trademark Blog

The TTABlog