Germany: BGH denies injunctive relief grace period in patent case
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: BGH denies injunctive relief grace period in patent case

In case of a patent infringement, the patentee normally has an interest not only in obtaining damages from the infringer, but also that the infringer immediately stops the infringing action. A request for an injunctive relief against the infringer is therefore standard practice in patent litigation. In such a situation the infringer may have an interest in being granted a grace period in order to gain time to find a bypass solution or to deplete his stock of infringing products. Such a grace period for the infringer, known from copyright or competition law cases, has also been discussed in patent law literature as an exceptional measure. It may be granted by a court if an immediate cessation of sales of the infringing product were to lead to disproportionate disadvantages for the infringer. Granting such a grace period requires reflecting the overall circumstances of the individual case, and such a limited continuation of the infringing action must not cause unacceptable adverse effects on the infringed party.

In a recent decision (BGH X ZR 114/13 "Wärmetauscher") the German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) ruled for the first time on the prerequisites for granting such a grace period to the patent infringer. In the case decided, the defendant was found to infringe a patent directed to a heat exchanger for a convertible car seat heating system. The defendant requested a grace period on the injunctive relief until the cars that had been ordered up to the date of the Supreme Court´s decision and that had already been equipped with a system including the infringing product have been delivered to customers. The defendant argued that in litigation lasting almost 10 years, where previous instances always denied an infringement, granting injunctive relief with immediate effect after the BGH's surprising infringement decision would negatively affect the infringer disproportionately.

The BGH decided not to grant a grace period in the case in question and argued that stricter rules apply in patent infringement than, for example, in trade mark infringement. Referring expressly to case law of the England and Wales High Court in Navitaire ([2005] EWHC 0282 [Ch]), the BGH concurred that an unconditional injunctive relief may only be avoided if its effects were "grossly disproportionate" in relation to the benefit for the protected right, or even "oppressive". The BGH, like the High Court, concluded that in patent infringement strictly handling exceptions from unconditional injunctive relief is also in line with Article 3 of the European Parliament´s Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive.

By this recent decision, it has now been clarified by the Federal Supreme Court that there is factually no grace period from injunctive relief for the patent infringer, unless very exceptional circumstances apply.

hansen.jpg

Norbert Hansen


Maiwald Patentanwalts GmbHElisenhof, Elisenstr 3D-80335, Munich, GermanyTel: +49 89 74 72 660 Fax: +49 89 77 64 24info@maiwald.euwww.maiwald.eu

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A 36-member team from Zhong Lun Law Firm, including six partners, will join the newly formed East IP Group
The Delhi High Court sided with Ericsson against Indian smartphone maker Lava, bringing the companies' nine-year dispute to a close
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Tennessee has passed the ELVIS Act, a law that fights against AI models that mimic the voice and likeness of music artists
Rob Stien, chief communications and public policy officer at InterDigital, says the EU has forgotten innovators while trying to solve an issue that doesn’t exist
As Australia’s Qantm IP leans towards being acquired by a private equity company, sources discuss what it could mean for IP firms
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
Nghiem Xuan Bac Pham, managing partner of Vision & Associates, discusses opportunities created by the US-China rift as well as profitability issues facing IP practices
Douglas Leite and two of his colleagues were intrigued by Bhering Advogados’s mission to grow its patent litigation practice
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Gift this article