Preview: Monitoring online platforms
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Preview: Monitoring online platforms

Online platforms provide the opportunity for just about anyone to sell a product or service, without the resources required for brick-and-mortar commerce. That provides sellers of counterfeit and contraband goods with the perfect hiding place: in plain sight, among countless others, and isolated from the in-person scrutiny of a potential buyer.

Estimates suggest that 60% of all counterfeit goods are sold online, and brand owners essentially have two courses of action available to them: “Follow the protocols of the IP protection policies that all of the platforms have, or pursue and confront counterfeiters and start legal actions,” according to Virginia Cervieri of Cervieri Monsuárez & Associates in Uruguay, who will moderate a panel, CT21, on online enforcement on Tuesday. Many brand owners choose “cooperation” with e-commerce platform providers over “confrontation,” Cervieri says.

Tuesday’s panel will feature speakers from Tommy Hilfiger, Adidas, Luxottica and Levi Strauss, who will present three cases demonstrating their coordination with popular platforms—Facebook, Alibaba and MercadoLibre. Each of these e-commerce platforms has policies to prohibit the sale of counterfeit goods and prevent IP infringement on their sites (as do most), but infringers can and do slip through. Once these counterfeit products are on the sites, “the brand owners, in my opinion, have all of the work,” Cervieri says.

“They have to monitor, notify the platforms and then wait for removal, which can take sometimes almost a week,” says Cervieri.

While the platforms do have policies in place, they are not proactive and place too much of the burden on brand owners, she adds. “The only other option available to brand owners is to confront individual infringers themselves and begin legal action. Neither option is efficient.”

The questions that will be addressed in the session, then, are: “Will the brand owners continue to cooperate, or will the platforms have to become more cooperative, and what are the common problems that brand owners are facing with these platforms?” says Cervieri.

CT21 Online Enforcement: Counterfeit Products, Contraband but Genuine Products, Parallel Imports is on Tuesday at 11:45

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The former head of life sciences at Kramer Levin has joined Orrick, a firm that hopes to grow in the sector
Lionel Martin of August Debouzy and Kristof Neefs at Inteo share how they prevailed in a UPC Court of Appeal case surrounding access to documents
Counsel say ‘strange’ results have increased their reliance on subscription-based search platforms, but costs are not being shifted onto clients yet
The firm was among multiple winners at a record-breaking 2024 ceremony held in London on April 11
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Americas research cycle has commenced. Do not miss this opportunity to nominate your work!
Increased and new patent fees could affect prosecution strategies for law firms and companies, according to sources
Five former Oblon lawyers felt that joining Merchant & Gould would help them offer the right prices to entice clients
The UK may not be a UPC member but its firms are still acting in proceedings, with Carpmaels among the most prominent
Naomi Pearce of Pearce IP shares how she is helping her firm become a life sciences leader and how generous policies have helped attract top talent
Gift this article