China trade marks: Special campaign on protection of Disney trade marks
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China trade marks: Special campaign on protection of Disney trade marks

On October 15, the national authority in China responsible for administrative enforcement of trade marks, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC), issued a notice announcing an unusual year-long campaign to provide special trade mark protection to the Walt Disney Company.

The SAIC notice states that the campaign has been initiated to protect the opening and future development of the Shanghai Disney Resort, to protect the interests of Chinese consumers and to "uphold China's international image for safeguarding intellectual property rights".

The campaign is being launched as Disney enters into the homestretch towards the planned opening in spring 2016 of its $5.5 billion theme park. Disney is a minority investor in the resort, with 57% of the park owned by a group of companies controlled by the city government of Shanghai.

The contents of the campaign are not entirely unprecedented, as similar initiatives are pursued from time to time for special events, such as the Olympic Games or where public health and safety are threatened. But the focus of this new campaign is unusual in that it focuses on a sole brand owner, Disney.

Highlights of the campaign are summarised below.

Protection zones

The SAIC notice provides for the creation of a "key trade mark protection zone" covering approximately seven square kilometres surrounding the Shanghai Disney Resort. Within the zone, enforcement efforts by local Administrations for Industry and Commerce (AICs) will be significantly increased to "comprehensively eliminate" Disney trade mark infringement.

In addition, the special campaign will establish "coordinated protection zones" in other areas of Shanghai and northeast China in conjunction with local AICs and market supervision bureaux (MSBs) to increase local enforcement efforts and develop cross-border information and evidence-sharing practices.

Special "emergency teams" are to be formed within designated zones to provide swift resolution of trade mark enforcement actions undertaken during the special campaign. (Just how these teams differ from existing AIC and MSB raid teams remains to be seen.)

National collective rectification

In addition to these protection zones, the SAIC notice also calls for local enforcement agencies nationwide to carry out "collective rectification" against local infringers for a period of one year following the opening of the Shanghai Disney Resort. The focus of these efforts appear targeted on production, with emphasis given to areas where fake goods are produced, where trade marks are printed and where wholesale distribution is conducted.

The SAIC notice also encourages authorities in medium and large cities nationwide, as well as popular tourist cities, to liaise closely with the Shanghai AIC to strengthen enforcement and "narrow the space for criminal elements to carry out activities infringing on Disney's registered trade marks".

Online enforcement

The SAIC notice calls for "major internet platforms" to establish "Disney trade mark protection mechanisms" to crack down on large scale infringement of Disney marks online. The notice does not otherwise suggest a particular role for local AICs in online monitoring or enforcement – a long-standing gap in China's current enforcement regime.

Training and public awareness

The SAIC notice states that the SAIC will organise training for provincial-level AICs and MSBs to boost their knowledge of Disney brands and the implementation measures for the special campaign. Local AICs and MSBs are also required to strengthen public awareness of Disney trade marks through seminars, training, media briefings and other activities carried out through the course of the campaign.

Reporting

Provincial-level AICs and MSBs are required to file a report to the SAIC of their enforcement results by November 2016.

Relevance to other IP owners?

No doubt other foreign and local IP owners suffering from extreme levels of counterfeiting in China will cite the SAIC Notice in their future efforts to press the SAIC and local AICs for more systematic measures for protecting their rights. But few foreign companies have a major city government as their joint venture partner.

SIPS Hong Kong

Lockhart Road No 3

Wanchai, Hong Kong

China

mail@sips.asia

Tel: +852 2866 6400

Fax: +852 2866 6408

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The winner of Managing IP’s Life Achievement Award discusses 50 years in IP law and how even he can’t avoid imposter syndrome
Saya Choudhary of Singh & Singh explains how her team navigated nine years of litigation to secure record damages of $29 million and the lessons learned along the way
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
A team of IP and media law specialists has joined from SKW Schwarz alongside a former counsel at Sky
The Irish government has delayed a planned referendum on whether Ireland should join the Unified Patent Court, prompting concern about when a vote may take place
With more than 250 winners recognised during the ceremony, there are many reasons to be positive about the health of the IP industry in EMEA
Practitioners say the USPTO’s latest guidance has some helpful clarifications and is a good reminder of the importance of checking AI outputs
Susanne Schmidt discusses why trademarks are more than 'just a name' and why she would choose green farming as an alternative career
The former head of life sciences at Kramer Levin has joined Orrick, a firm that hopes to grow in the sector
Lionel Martin of August Debouzy and Kristof Neefs at Inteo share how they prevailed in a UPC Court of Appeal case surrounding access to documents
Gift this article