Trade groups urge US Congress to expand CBM review
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Trade groups urge US Congress to expand CBM review

A group of trade associations wrote to US Congress yesterday urging politicians to expand a review of business method patents to help them fight patent trolls

The 26 organisations, which included retail groups, marketing associations and public interest advocates such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said the system is being exploited by patent trolls who impose “huge costs” that “drain funds from job creation." They claimed that in 2011 alone, patent assertion entities (PAEs) cost American businesses at least $29 billion.

The authors claim that defending a patent lawsuit typically a small or medium business $1.75 million and the average cost of patent litigation is $6 million. They claim that 7,000 businesses were sued by PAEs in 2011-2012 and that the number of companies sued by patent assertion entities has increased by 28% a year of average since 2004.

“Because proving a PAE’s patent invalid through litigation can take years and cost millions, a targeted company faces a no-win situation: it can pay lawyers, the PAE, or both,” they said.

The groups want Congress to expand Covered Business Method (CBM) review, which is limited at present to financial services patents, to other industries. Under CBM review, a procedure for challenging business method patents, a party being sued for patent infringement can ask the USPTO to invalidate a patent. The USPTO can consider whether a patent is abstract, vague, or too broad during CBM, but these grounds for invalidation are not available under other procedures conducted through the USPTO.

Attempting to get a patent invalidated under CBM costs around $100,000, including around $30,000 in USPTO fees, compared to multimillion-dollar litigation. Several businesses targeted by one patent owner would also be able to split the fees and costs for the procedure.

Expanding CBM review to cover all types of patents has previously been proposed by several pieces of legislation, including the Innovation Act, introduced earlier this month, and the Stopping the Offensive Use of Patents (STOP) Act, introduced in July.




more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A 36-member team from Zhong Lun Law Firm, including six partners, will join the newly formed East IP Group
The Delhi High Court sided with Ericsson against Indian smartphone maker Lava, bringing the companies' nine-year dispute to a close
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Tennessee has passed the ELVIS Act, a law that fights against AI models that mimic the voice and likeness of music artists
Rob Stien, chief communications and public policy officer at InterDigital, says the EU has forgotten innovators while trying to solve an issue that doesn’t exist
As Australia’s Qantm IP leans towards being acquired by a private equity company, sources discuss what it could mean for IP firms
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
Nghiem Xuan Bac Pham, managing partner of Vision & Associates, discusses opportunities created by the US-China rift as well as profitability issues facing IP practices
Douglas Leite and two of his colleagues were intrigued by Bhering Advogados’s mission to grow its patent litigation practice
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Gift this article