Samsung wins ITC ban on Apple products
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Samsung wins ITC ban on Apple products

The ITC has banned imports and sales of several older iPhone and iPad models sold by AT&T after finding Apple infringed a patent owned by Samsung

On Tuesday, the ITC issued a limited order preventing sales and imports of AT&T models of the iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS, iPad 3G and iPad 2 3G. Samsung had also accused Apple of violating another three patents, but the ITC ruled that the Silicon Valley company did not infringe those.

The ITC ruled that Apple had infringed a standard essential patent covering 3G wireless technology.

The ruling reversed a September decision by ITC Judge James Gildea, who found that Apple did not infringe the patents. The case, 337-794, was filed in August 2011.

The case is the latest instalment in a long-running battle between the two companies over smartphone technology.

"We are disappointed that the commission has overturned an earlier ruling and we plan to appeal. Today’s decision has no impact on the availability of Apple products in the United States," Apple spokeswoman Kristin Huguet said in a statement.

Samsung issued a statement which said the ITC decision “confirmed Apple’s history of free-riding on Samsung’s technological innovations”.

“Our decades of research and development in mobile technologies will continue and we will continue to offer innovative products to consumers in the United States,” it read.

Apple has filed a separate ITC complaint, accusing Samsung of infringing two patents relating to its iPhone and iPad devices. An ITC judge ruled that Samsung infringed one patent but not the other. A final ruling on that case is expected in August.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Loes van den Winkel, attorney at Arnold & Siedsma, explains why clients' enthusiasm is contagious and why her job does not mean managing fashion models
Allen & Gledhill partner Jia Yi Toh shares her experience of representing the winning team in the first-ever case filed under Singapore’s new fast-track IP dispute resolution system
In-house lawyers reveal how they balance cost, quality, and other criteria to get the most from their relationships with external counsel
Dario Pietrantonio of Robic discusses growth opportunities for the firm and shares insights from his journey to managing director
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Practitioners analyse a survey on how law firms prove value to their clients and reflect on why the concept can be hard to pin down
Gift this article