Next steps on Madrid Protocol

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Next steps on Madrid Protocol

sign-45.jpg

INTA President Toe Su Aung yesterday signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Miguel Angel Margain Gonzalez, Director General of the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI), with INTA agreeing to help Mexico with the implementation of the Madrid Protocol.

The Protocol entered into force in Mexico in February this year. Yesterday Margain, as well as representatives of the Colombian and New Zealand offices, spoke to the INTA Daily News about the international trademark system.

sign-300.jpg

Colombia deposited its instrument of accession in May 2012 and the Protocol entered into force in August last year. Jose Luis Londono Fernandez, Deputy for Industrial Property in Colombia’s Superintendency of Industrial Property, said that the first International Application based on a Colombian registration was filed last week: “We are on the map now. Our key objective going forward is that the Madrid Protocol should be used by domestic companies. We will do a seminar about it in July in three of the main industrial cities in Colombia.”

Since the Protocol entered into force in Mexico, there have been at least 12 international applications filed by national applicants, and the country has been designated in about 100 international applications.

“We had to implement some changes to the law to accommodate the Madrid Protocol. For example, we are a single class country—we didn’t have multi-class applications. Our data system had to include the Madrid system applications,” said Margain. “We don’t have a trademark opposition system, but that’s not a requirement to be part of the Madrid Protocol. We are talking to the industry associations about whether an opposition system is needed,” he added.

Since joining the System in October last year, New Zealand has been designated about 1,400 times and some 100 applicants have used the country as the basis for an international application. Ingrid Bayliss, National Manager of New Zealand’s Intellectual Property Office, said the system has been popular with domestic applicants, including small businesses, as it also covers most of New Zealand’s main trading partners, such as Australia, China and the United States.

She added that the Office used accession as an opportunity to update its IT systems. It now has a 100% online case management system, which is compulsory for applicants. “This has enabled us to cut a number of costs from the Office, and we have passed those savings on to applicants,” said Bayliss.

Margáin said Mexico is following a similar path: “The Madrid Protocol has also helped us to build the e-filing system. By 2014, we will have the whole process available electronically.”

Global Brand Database

Find out more about the Madrid Protocol and the Global Brand Database at WIPO’s booth in the Exhibition Hall. The Database includes records of more than 11 million marks from 10 offices, including the United States and WIPO. Enhancements, including a link with OHIM’s TMview database, are expected to be added soon. Glenn Macstravic, Head of the Brand Data Base Unit at WIPO, said he welcomed feedback from users at the Annual Meeting: “Don’t be afraid to come and tell us what we can do better to help you.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article