Lacoste loses its trade mark in China


Case of the Year: Lacoste v Jin Zhongneng

The result

Lacoste's crocodile mark revoked for non-use

The impact

Bar raised on what counts as use of a trade mark

Trade mark squatters are a major problem for international brand owners in China. Lawyers have consistently advised clients of the need to register early and broadly to protect their mark, but the recent revocation of French clothing brand Lacoste's mark shows that active use and management of a mark is also needed, alongside registration.

Lacoste received protection for its crocodile logo and related marks in 2003 for class 16, which covers various paper goods. In 2007, Jin Zhongneng filed for revocation of the mark in class 16 due to three consecutive years of non-use. The Trademark Office revoked the mark in 2009. The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (TRAB) reversed, finding that there was evidence of use.

On Jin's appeal to the Beijing...


Please log in to read the rest of this article.

New to Managing Intellectual Property? Take advantage of one week’s FREE access and become a Managing IP member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.

Already registered?

Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.

Log in

Join us now

Gain 7 days FREE access when you register now.

Join here

profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

#MIPShanghai kicking off! Ningling Wang of@FinneganIPLaw introduces the first panel speakers. http://t.co/MpdNqh472D

Sep 3 2014 01:10 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Had a good planning call for our 10th Sept webinar on early dispute resolution today. More details & register here http://t.co/gh3Ka8t9q1

Sep 2 2014 05:23 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Due tomorrow from #CJEU: Deckmyn v Vandersteen judgment on copyright & parody http://t.co/ndAIMQwBPQ Any predictions from twitter?

Sep 2 2014 03:53 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
More from the Managing IP blog


September 2014

The surprising rise of the PTAB

Patent owners have been shocked at how popular IPR proceedings at the PTAB have proven. As the USPTO mulls over changes and the Federal Circuit braces itself for a deluge of appeals, Michael Loney reports on how the PTAB is likely to evolve



Most read articles

Supplements