FICPI and its campaign for relevance: Project Orange


How the private practice association is attempting to increase its relevance

Julian Crump, FICPI
FICPI has one of the hardest jobs differentiating itself from other associations.

It is relatively small: it has 5000 members, but 3000 of those are from Germany – where all patent attorneys are automatically members. It has a heavy bias towards Europe, and its events are among the most expensive: the cheapest ticket for the Melbourne meeting was $3070, compared to $970 for INTA. It has always been known for networking, but the dynamics of big events are rapidly changing. Finally, it is the only association representing purely lawyers in private practice. But how relevant is that distinction today?

FICPI went through its own soul-searching period during 2008 and 2009. The conclusions were very similar to those from the Robin Rolfe report...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


More from the Managing IP blog


Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the the 135th INTA Annual Meeting in Dallas


 

 

 

 


May 2013

Look behind the salaries

A survey of the largest IP practices in the US reveals rising compensation, but only at general-practice firms. And partners are having a hard time everywhere. Alli Pyrah explains who is hiring and what lawyers they need



Most read articles

Poll

Following the US Apple v Samsung trial, do you think juries should play a role in patent cases?







Supplements