Court cases highlight product liability for licensors


A common objective of a brand owner when entering into a licensing agreement is to ensure that its licensee assumes all responsibility for manufacturing the licensed products and all liability for consequences as a result thereof. While the typical trade mark licence includes certain indemnification provisions aimed at ensuring that the licensor achieves this objective, a few recent court decisions have highlighted instances where such standard indemnification provisions do not sufficiently protect licensors. Such decisions reveal an emerging issue with respect to product liability that brand owners engaged in licensing their trade marks must pay careful attention to, namely the possibility that they will be held liable for injuries resulting from the...


Please log in to read the rest of this article.

New to Managing Intellectual Property? Take advantage of one week’s FREE access and become a Managing IP member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.

Already registered?

Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.

Log in

Join us now

Gain 7 days FREE access when you register now.

Join here

profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

Microsoft sues Samsung for breaking IP cross-licensing agreement http://t.co/POa9CvoLUk

Aug 1 2014 10:19 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Sounds messy RT @ReutersLegal: #Aereo, 'bleeding to death,' seeks emergency court help http://t.co/cm1xbWe0xA #IP

Aug 1 2014 03:29 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Could be some trademarks up for grabs ... RT @fastFT: P&G to shed up to 100 brands in streamlining http://t.co/FRPKgqRqkh

Aug 1 2014 01:14 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
More from the Managing IP blog


July/August 2014

IP’s most influential people 2014

The 50 people in social media, advocacy and debate influencing IP policy



Most read articles

Supplements