Why your trade mark licence may survive bankruptcy


Jim Leshaw and Ari Newman explain how a recent case has created uncertainty around the fate of trade mark licence agreements after being rejected in bankruptcy proceedings

Section 365 of the US Bankruptcy Code empowers a trustee or debtor in possession to reject so-called executory contracts that are burdensome to the bankrupt estate. Courts usually define an executory contract as one where material performance remains on both sides of a licence agreement; such a contract may be rejected in bankruptcy. Under section 365(g) of the code, the rejection of an executory contract constitutes a breach of such a contract immediately before the date of the filing of the bankruptcy petition. Section 365(n) details the effect of rejection of "an executory contract under which the debtor is a licensor of a right to intellectual property", but the term intellectual property is defined narrowly to include trade secrets, patents and copyrights, and not trade marks, trade names and service marks. Congress's failure to include trade marks, trade names and service marks in this definition has left courts without clear...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


More from the Managing IP blog


June 2013

The Madrid Protocol comes of age

India’s accession means the Madrid Protocol now covers more than two-thirds of the world’s population. Is this the tipping-point for the international trade mark system, and what reforms are needed? Emma Barraclough, James Nurton and Alli Pyrah report



Most read articles

Poll

Following the US Apple v Samsung trial, do you think juries should play a role in patent cases?







Supplements