Design patent lessons from Apple v Samsung


Christopher Carani draws on Apple’s smartphone litigation with Samsung to try and distinguish what kind of designs are likely to be found to infringe

Despite Apple's impressive arsenal of utility patents, it was an Apple design patent that was the basis for the nationwide preliminary injunction on Samsung's Galaxy 10.1 tablet. Further, despite Herculean efforts to scour the earth for prior art, Samsung's spirited attempt to invalidate Apple's design patents at the summary judgment stage was ultimately rebuffed. Even apart from the verdict, by taking the heavyweight boxing match into the tenth round, the strength of Apple's design patents surprised many – perhaps even Samsung. ...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


More from the Managing IP blog


Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the the 135th INTA Annual Meeting in Dallas


 

 

 

 


May 2013

Look behind the salaries

A survey of the largest IP practices in the US reveals rising compensation, but only at general-practice firms. And partners are having a hard time everywhere. Alli Pyrah explains who is hiring and what lawyers they need



Most read articles

Poll

Following the US Apple v Samsung trial, do you think juries should play a role in patent cases?







Supplements