Jury deliberations, Chinese patents and an assassination investigator: This week's quiz

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Jury deliberations, Chinese patents and an assassination investigator: This week's quiz

Five questions on items covered on managingip.com and our twitter feed (@managingip) in the past week. Plus: answers to last week’s questions on the WTO, Victoria Pendleton and Myriad

1. A former director of the USPTO said this of the Office’s final rules on post-grant opposition proceedings: “We continue to have concerns that some of the final rules do not necessarily provide the kind of flexibility and efficiency of process that we believe they could.” Who is he?

2. Which trade association last week published a report critical of China’s patent policies?

3. WIPO has commissioned an independent investigation into technical assistance it provided to North Korea and Iran. It is being led by Stig Edqvist of Sweden and John Barker of the US. Edqvist previously investigated a high-profile assassination. Whose?

4. Musicians from which country performed for politicians last week after they passed a law giving performers more rights to royalties?

5. How many days did it take the jury in the Apple v Samsung trial in California to reach its decision?

Answers to last week’s questions

1. Judge William Bryson wrote a dissenting opinion in Myriad saying: “The court’s decision, if sustained, will likely have broad consequences, such as preempting methods for whole-genome sequencing.”

2. India’s Supreme Court was due to hear final arguments in a patent dispute that affects Novartis’ Glivec (the hearing was postponed to September).

3. Judge Richard Posner of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled in a copyright dispute between MyVidster and Flava Works.

4. Ukraine has filed a request for a panel to hear its complaint that Australia’s tobacco plain packaging rules violate TRIPs.

5. Victoria Pendleton promotes Pantene.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article