London Olympics: lessons from athlete sponsorship

Simon Crompton, London


The Olympic Games demonstrated that sponsorship of athletes is often a more fruitful way of associating a brand with the Games than direct advertising

During the Games in London over the past three weeks, many companies seemed to push the boundaries of ambush marketing with their advertising, despite London introducing some of the strictest rules ever to protect sponsors.

Those rules were very broad, but also vague, leading to uncertainty among brand owners. Managing IP recently presented a sliding scale of those adverts, demonstrating which risked the London organising committee, Locog, taking enforcement action.

In a comment to that article, a reader asked about the situation regarding sponsorship of individual athletes. The answer is that a combination of waivers to the rules and unwillingness to go after star athletes makes ambush marketing here much easier.

The rules binding individual athletes are not contained in legislation introduced by countries hosting the Games, as with direct advertising, but in the Olympic Charter. Rule 40 simply restricts athletes competing in the Games from appearing in advertising...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you seven days access to Managing IP and regular newsletters for the international IP community, and US and Canadian practitioners specifically.

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


Related Articles

Supplements

Most read articles