Megaupload judge steps down

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Megaupload judge steps down

David Harvey, the New Zealand judge overseeing the extradition of Kim Dotcom to the United States has recused himself from the case

Judge_David_Harvey

Kim Dotcom, one of Managing IP’s 50 most influential people in IP, is the founder of Megaupload, the cloud storage service shut down earlier this year by the US government. The United States has brought criminal copyright infringement charges against Dotcom and other company executives, claiming that they knowingly allowed and encouraged users to use the site for infringement. The US wants to extradite Dotcom from New Zealand, where he is domiciled.

According to the National Business Review, Judge Harvey was speaking at the NetHui conference in New Zealand. In a discussion about the effects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement on IP issues such as DVD region locking, he reportedly said: “We have met the enemy, and he is the US”.

The Chief Judge of the district court, Jan-Marie Doogue, told the press that Judge Harvey stepped down of his own accord, “recognis(ing) that remarks made in the context of a paper he delivered on copyright law at a recent internet conference could reflect on his impartiality”.

Kim_Dotcom

The flamboyant Dotcom has been making headlines since persuading the New Zealand courts to relax the terms of his bail. He has announced that he will release a dance album to pay his legal fees, used Twitter to mock the charges levelled against him, and accused US Vice-President Joe Biden of personally ordering Megaupload’s shutdown.

To see Managing IP’s complete Top 50 list for 2012, click here.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article