Myriad gene patent case sparks concern among non-medical biotech companies

Eileen McDermott, New York


Twenty-three companies have sent a joint letter to the attorney general and solicitor general of the United States to ask that their concerns be considered as the government develops its position on the Myriad gene patent case

The Myriad case was remanded to the Federal Circuit in March following the Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo v Prometheus. Under the Prometheus decision, the Federal Circuit must reevaluate its July 2011 ruling in favour of Myriad Genetics.

While the claims at issue in Myriad are compositions of matter rather than diagnostic method claims, the letter’s authors are concerned that the Prometheus decision’s focus on so-called laws of nature being unpatentable may affect the outcome of Myriad this time around.

“Subjecting such inventions...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


More from the Managing IP blog


Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the the 135th INTA Annual Meeting in Dallas


 

 

 

 


May 2013

Look behind the salaries

A survey of the largest IP practices in the US reveals rising compensation, but only at general-practice firms. And partners are having a hard time everywhere. Alli Pyrah explains who is hiring and what lawyers they need



Most read articles

Poll

Following the US Apple v Samsung trial, do you think juries should play a role in patent cases?







Supplements