UK fast-tracks Apple/Samsung design case

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK fast-tracks Apple/Samsung design case

A judge in the England & Wales High Court has said that a trial between smartphone rivals Apple and Samsung in a designs dispute can be held in June

Yesterday Mr Justice Mann accepted Samsung's request for an expedited hearing in the case, in which it is seeking a declaration of non-infringement against Apple's registered Community designs. It is also seeking an injunction restraining Apple from making threats to sue for infringement.

Samsung argued that a hearing should be expedited to remove uncertainty about whether its products infringe Apple's rights.

Mann rejected a request that the trial be heard as soon as this month, but said it could be heard in June. It is expected to last one or two days.

Apple had opposed the acceleration of the trial and may appeal the decision. It had also challenged Samsung's right to bring the action in the UK.

Apple had previously sued Samsung for infringing its Community designs in Germany and the Netherlands, winning an injunction in the former but not the latter. Further proceedings in both these cases, and in Spain, are expected later this year.

On August 9 last year Samsung filed invalidation actions against the registered design rights at OHIM. Invalidation decisions typically take about a year, so these will also be expected during 2012.

The parties are also contesting various cases to do with patent rights in Europe and elsewhere.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Acquisition of platform developed by Boehmert & Boehmert lawyer set to create a combined platform for patent drafting and prosecution in Europe
Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Gift this article