Plain packaging rules extended to all tobacco products

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Plain packaging rules extended to all tobacco products

The Australian government has published an amendment to the Tobacco Plain Packaging Regulations 2011, broadening its parameters to apply to non-cigarette tobacco products.

The Regulations initially set out requirements for the retail packaging and appearance of cigarettes only, and did not apply to non-cigarette tobacco merchandise.

The amendments now include definitions of bidi, cigar, cigar tube and pouch, which are consistent with the definitions found in the Competition and Consumer (Tobacco) Information Standard 2011.

The amendment added three new regulations which describe proposed features of non-cigarette tobacco product packaging. These include strict dimensions for non-cigarette tobacco packages, and the outlawing of tobacco packs from having a transparent or cut-out area that reveals its contents before it is opened.

Plain packaging legislation was passed by the Australian government in November last year, and has been met with stiff resistance by tobacco companies, which claim that the legislation breaches Australia’s commitments under the TRIPs Agreement and will make it easier for cigarette packs to be counterfeited.

Earlier this week, Ukraine launched a legal offensive at the WTO against Australia’s plain packaging legislation.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article