US authorities act against Megaupload

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US authorities act against Megaupload

kimschmitz45.jpg

Copyright owners are celebrating after US officials yesterday shut down file-sharing site megaupload.com which allegedly earned $175 million over seven years

kimschmitz.jpg

In an indictment laid down in a Virginia District Court, seven men are accused of committing copyright infringement offences and other crimes such as racketeering.

Police in New Zealand arrested four of the site’s operators yesterday and are searching for the other three men. The US Justice Department has begun extradition proceedings against the men, who said that they have nothing to hide.

The group, led by a man calling himself Kim Dotcom, used megaupload.com and 17 other domains to distribute “many millions” of copyrighted movies, music, games and electronic books, according to US authorities.

In the indictment it says the men allegedly made $175 million in revenues from advertising and premium subscriptions. The main site megaupload.com allegedly had 150 million subscribers and 50 million daily visitors.

The US Department of Justice claims that the men hid the identities of file-sharers and offered financial incentives for subscribers to upload “popular” works. Subscribers could apparently earn $10,000 if they accumulated 5 million reward points.

Although Dotcom’s company Megaupload Ltd was registered in Hong Kong, some of the alleged pirated content was hosted on servers in the US state of Virginia.

In January 2011 FBI agents began working with New Zealand authorities to investigate the site’s operators – based at Dotcom’s mansion in Auckland. In yesterday’s arrest, police seized dozens of goods such as cars, televisions and cameras.

Treaty

Under a treaty signed in 1970 between the US and New Zealand, the men can be extradited for their alleged crimes. The defendants would be the first people to be extradited from New Zealand to the US on copyright infringement charges.

According to the treaty, the men can only be extradited if there is “sufficient evidence” to justify a trial by New Zealand courts. Lawyers at today’s hearing at the North Shore District Court in Auckland said US authorities will have 45 days to file extradition papers.

But Fairfax media in New Zealand said today’s hearing was the first step in a long extradition process that could last at least one year.

CNBC has reported that the defendants have employed an attorney called Ira Rothken – a man well-known for defending web site owners accused of copyright infringement. According to the report, he said: “The government has taken down one of the world's largest storage providers and have done so without giving Megaupload an opportunity to be heard in court.”

After the men were arrested hackers targeted websites belonging to the FBI, US Justice Department, Motion Picture Association of America and the Recording Industry Association of America. Hacking-activist group Anonymous said it was behind the disruption.

The arrests follow a decision by a judge in London last week who said British man Richard O’Dwyer can be extradited to the US on copyright infringement charges. This week, thousands of websites led by encyclopaedia Wikipedia, protested against proposed US legislation to clamp down on internet piracy.

The indictment on the seven men and the two companies that they had registered can be seen here.


Some of the property subject to forfeiture listed in the indictment

$175 million

58 bank accounts in countries including New Zealand, Germany, the Czech Republic, Hong Kong and Singapore

4 Paypal accounts and 2 Moneybookers accounts

23 cars, including 15 Mercedes, a Maserati, a Rolls-Royce Phantom and a Mini Cooper

8 televisions

3 statues and numerous artworks

2 cameras

2 motorbikes

1 jetski

1 timepiece

18 domain names

60 servers

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article