Managing Intellectual Property

Canada’s business method battle

01 July 2010

Managing Intellectual Property

Scott Davidson contrasts approaches to patent subject matter eligibility and business method patents in Canada and the US, highlighting some key Canadian developments

While the Supreme Court was getting ready to release its decision on the Bilski case dealing with business method patents on June 28, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) released a proposed section of their guide to patents that deals with the treatment of computer implemented inventions in Canada. With the release of the Bilski decision by the US Supreme Court and the release of this new section of the guide by CIPO, it appears that in some cases the same patent application might receive very different treatment under Canadian and US law.

New guidance proposed

On June 16, CIPO released a revised chapter 16 of the Manual of Patent Office Practice (MOPOP) entitled "Computer implemented inventions" to the public for review and comments. The MOPOP is a guide for patent examiners, applicants and patent agents to the operational procedures and examination practices in the Office. The MOPOP is not...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


February 2012

Patent survey 2012

Managing IP ranks the leading patent firms around the world



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements