Bittersweet decision for Mars but Cadbury settles purple dispute
Australians overindulging this Christmas can eat Maltesers and the full range of Darrell Lea and Cadbury chocolates, but may have to wait till next year to sample Malt Balls
On December 11 the Full Federal Court dismissed an appeal by Mars Australia against an earlier Federal Court decision that the packaging of Sweet Rewards chocolate malt balls did not mislead consumers.
Earlier this year Cadbury and Darrell Lea confidentially settled a long-running legal battle that included disputes over trade mark registrations for the colour purple for chocolate and a passing off case.
In the first dispute, Mars accused Sweet Rewards, which was selling Malt Balls in discount stores, of passing off and misleading and deceptive conduct and accused the retailer of infringing two registered packaging trade marks for Maltesers.
In June this year Justice Perram of the Federal Court of Australia stated that it is highly unlikely that any ordinary consumer of chocolate confectionary could...
Please log in
to read the rest of this article. New to Managing Intellectual Property?
Take advantage of one week’s FREE access
and become a Managing IP member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.
Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.
Join us nowGain 7 days FREE access when you register now.