Managing Intellectual Property

How to win with court-appointed experts

01 June 2009

More judges may start appointing independent experts to help juries understand technical issues in patent cases. This is how to turn the trend to your advantage

In patent infringement suits, the merits of a case often lie in deciding highly technical and complex issues of science. For a jury, this is an incredible task to undertake. To assist the jury, counsel often call upon technical experts to present the technical issues of their case. The expert will testify not only to explain the technology, but also to offer an opinion on the ultimate issues to be decided. One party's expert, however, is often met with an expert from the other side. As a result, the jury is left to decide highly technical issues based on the competing testimony of experts. The outcome of the case therefore often depends on which expert the jury felt was more credible....



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


February 2012

Patent survey 2012

Managing IP ranks the leading patent firms around the world



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements