Managing Intellectual Property

Discussions on EU patent court set to intensify

06 June 2008

James Nurton, London

British judge Lord Justice Jacob described having one central jurisdiction to hear both infringement and validity as a “red line” during discussions over a single EU patent litigation system last week

His comments, made at a launch seminar for the Institute of Brand and Innovation Law (IBIL) at University College London on Tuesday, came ahead of further discussions on the details of the proposed EU patent court later this month.

A 60-article draft Agreement on the EU Patent Judiciary was published on May 14, but many aspects still need to be worked on, including whether infringement and validity should be heard separately (so-called bifurcation).

In Germany, infringement and validity are always addressed in separate hearings. Austria adopts a similar approach.

But in most other EU countries, they are heard together. Proponents say this makes for a simpler, more efficient system, but Germany maintains that bifurcation is preferable.

Interviewed by Managing IP after the seminar, Jacob acknowledged: “There is some difference about bifurcation.”

Speaking at Tuesday’s seminar, Robin Stout of the UK IP Office, who has been representing the...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements