Managing Intellectual Property

Peterlin urges IP counsel to file better patents

06 May 2008

Managing Intellectual Property

The deputy director of the USPTO has appealed to in-house IP counsel and private practitioners to provide more and better information about their inventions up front

Margaret Peterlin made her comments during a keynote address delivered at the IQPC Global IP Exchange conference in Pinehurst, North Carolina yesterday.

Peterlin said that the USPTO received 468,000 patent applications in 2007. By the end of 2007 there were a total of 760,000 patent applications pending at the Office. Although 1,200 new examiners will be hired this year, in the face of such numbers, Peterlin told the audience: “Hiring won’t help.”

Further complicating matters, 90% of all patent applications at the USPTO are rejected the first time they are reviewed. “There should be no disagreement that this is not an efficient allocation of resources,” she said.

One programme that has been implemented by the Office in an attempt to address patent pendency problems is the accelerated...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements