Managing Intellectual Property

Mapping the future of IP in China

01 September 2006

China's economy is fast developing - and many people fear that IP protection cannot keep up. International investors are concerned about effective enforcement, while domestic companies seek a strong environment for developing IP rights and negotiating on issues such as standards. MIP and Finnegan Henderson jointly hosted a roundtable discussion in Beijing last month to discuss how these issues can be addressed. Read the full, unabridged transcript exclusively here on managingip.com.

Sponsor:

JN: What is the National IP Strategy?

WXK: It's a very good question to ask: what is China's IP strategy? Each country has its own IP strategy at each specific time. China really feels it is in need of this IP strategy at this time. The most pressing objective is to raise the awareness of the broad masses of China about what IPR is and the need to respect IPR. The IP system is not born within Chinese society, because it can only be grown in a commodity society. It has developed in China only gradually.

In the late 1970s China began to open up to the world, to build its market economy and its IP system. In the first 20 years, the broad masses of China did not know much about IP. Despite WTO membership, they still do not know much about the essence of the IP system...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


February 2012

Patent survey 2012

Managing IP ranks the leading patent firms around the world



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements